Affiliation:
1. Schools of Pharmacy
2. Medicine
3. UNC Center for AIDS Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
4. GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Previous investigations have shown a significant negative two-way drug interaction between fosamprenavir (FPV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients and seronegative volunteers. This randomized, nonblinded, three-way crossover study of HIV-seronegative adult volunteers investigated dose separation and increased doses of RTV as a means to overcome the interaction between FPV and LPV/RTV. Eleven HIV-seronegative volunteers were given FPV plus LPV/RTV at 700 mg plus 400/100 mg every 12 hours (q12h) simultaneously for 10 days and then randomized to receive each of three 7-day treatments in one of six possible sequences, as follows: FPV plus LPV/RTV at 700 mg plus 400 mg/100 mg q12h simultaneously, FPV/RTV at 700 mg/100 mg q12h plus LPV/RTV at 400 mg/100 mg q12h, with doses separated by 4 h, and FPV/RTV at 1,400 mg/200 mg in the morning plus LPV/RTV at 800 mg/200 mg in the evening. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on day 8 of each treatment, and samples were analyzed for FPV, amprenavir (APV), LPV, and RTV concentrations by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean ratios (GMR [with 95% confidence intervals]) for the 4- and 12-h dose separation strategies compared to simultaneous administration were calculated for the areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to 24 h. Compared to simultaneous administration, RTV exposures increased with both 4-h and 12-h dose separation strategies (GMR, 5.30 [3.66 to 7.67] and 4.45 [3.09 to 6.41], respectively). LPV exposures also significantly increased with both 4-h and 12-h dose separation strategies (GMR, 1.76 [1.34 to 2.32] and 1.43 [1.02 to 2.01], respectively). However, both the 4- and 12-h strategies resulted in greater reductions in APV exposure (0.67 [0.54 to 0.83] and 0.77 [0.59 to 0.99], respectively) compared to simultaneous administration. Additional investigations are warranted to determine the optimal dosing of FPV with LPV/RTV.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology
Reference31 articles.
1. Abbott Laboratories. February 2005. Product information for Kaletra. [Online.] http://www.rxabbott.com/pdf/kaletrapi.pdf
.
2. AIDS Clinical Trials Group. AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) toxicity grading scale. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Silver Spring Md.
3. Allen, A., M. Vousden, A. Porter, and A. Lewis. 1999. Effect of Maalox on the bioavailability of oral gemifloxacin in healthy volunteers. Chemotherapy45:504-511.
4. Bertz R. G. C. Foit E. Ashbrenner D. Burt L. A. Williams T. Chira B. Bernstein R. Wieboldt E. Tillmann T. Heuser R. Rode A. Hsu G. R. Granneman and E. Sun. 2002. Effect of amprenavir on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus-positive and healthy subjects abstr. A-1823. Program Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. American Society for Microbiology Washington D.C.
5. Boffito, M., D. J. Back, T. F. Blaschke, M. Rowland, R. J. Bertz, J. G. Gerber, and V. Miller. 2003. Protein binding in antiretroviral therapies. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir.19:825-835.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献