Affiliation:
1. Laboratory of Toxicology, Pathology and Genetics (TOX), National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
2. MicroArray Department & Integrative Bioinformatics Unit (MAD-IBU), Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam (UvA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Phosphorylation is important in p53-mediated DNA damage responses. After UV irradiation, p53 is phosphorylated specifically at murine residue Ser389. Phosphorylation mutant p53.S389A cells and mice show reduced apoptosis and compromised tumor suppression after UV irradiation. We investigated the underlying cellular processes by time-series analysis of UV-induced gene expression responses in wild-type, p53.S389A, and p53
−/−
mouse embryonic fibroblasts. The absence of p53.S389 phosphorylation already causes small endogenous gene expression changes for 2,253, mostly p53-dependent, genes. These genes showed basal gene expression levels intermediate to the wild type and p53
−/−
, possibly to readjust the p53 network. Overall, the p53.S389A mutation lifts p53-dependent gene repression to a level similar to that of p53
−/−
but has lesser effect on p53-dependently induced genes. In the wild type, the response of 6,058 genes to UV irradiation was strictly biphasic. The early stress response, from 0 to 3 h, results in the activation of processes to prevent the accumulation of DNA damage in cells, whereas the late response, from 12 to 24 h, relates more to reentering the cell cycle. Although the p53.S389A UV gene response was only subtly changed, many cellular processes were significantly affected. The early response was affected the most, and many cellular processes were phase-specifically lost, gained, or altered, e.g., induction of apoptosis, cell division, and DNA repair, respectively. Altogether, p53.S389 phosphorylation seems essential for many p53 target genes and p53-dependent processes.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Cell Biology,Molecular Biology
Reference55 articles.
1. Appella, E., and C. W. Anderson. 2000. Signaling to p53: breaking the posttranslational modification code. Pathol. Biol. (Paris)48:227-245.
2. Appella, E., and C. W. Anderson. 2001. Post-translational modifications and activation of p53 by genotoxic stresses. Eur. J. Biochem.268:2764-2772.
3. Ashcroft, M., and K. H. Vousden. 1999. Regulation of p53 stability. Oncogene18:7637-7643.
4. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B57:289-300.
5. Bode, A. M., and Z. Dong. 2004. Post-translational modification of p53 in tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer4:793-805.