Validation of Cultivation and PCR Methods for Diagnosis of Lyme Neuroborreliosis
-
Published:2008-10
Issue:10
Volume:46
Page:3375-3379
-
ISSN:0095-1137
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Microbiology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Clin Microbiol
Author:
Cerar Tjaša1, Ogrinc Katarina2, Cimperman Jože2, Lotrič-Furlan Stanka2, Strle Franc2, Ružić-Sabljić Eva1
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical Faculty Ljubljana 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Borrelial infection may manifest with a wide range of clinical signs, and in many cases, microbiological findings are essential for a proper diagnosis. This study included 48 patients with a working clinical diagnosis of Lyme neuroborreliosis, 45 patients with a working clinical diagnosis of suspected Lyme neuroborreliosis, and a control group comprising 42 patients with tick-borne encephalitis and 21 neurosurgical patients. The aim of the study was to analyze and compare findings of two PCR methods and
Borrelia burgdorferi
sensu lato culture results by examination of prospectively collected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood specimens from patients with clinical features of Lyme neuroborreliosis. Borrelial DNA was detected with at least one of the PCR approaches in 16/135 (11.9%) blood samples and 24/156 (15.4%) CSF samples. Using MseI restriction of PCR products of the amplified
rrf
-
rrl
region, we identified the majority of strains as
Borrelia afzelii
. Borreliae were isolated from 1/135 (0.7%) blood samples and from 5/156 (3.2%) CSF specimens. Using MluI restriction for characterization of isolated strains,
Borrelia garinii
was identified in all CSF isolates. Our study revealed that different approaches for direct demonstration of borrelial infection give distinct results, that there is an urgent need for standardization of the methods for direct detection of borrelial infection, and that the design of studies evaluating the validation of such methods should include appropriate control group(s) to enable assessment of both sensitivity and specificity.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Microbiology (medical)
Reference25 articles.
1. Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis 2. Brouqui, P., F. Bacellar, G. Baranton, R. J. Birtles, A. Bjoërsdorff, J. R. Blanco, G. Caruso, M. Cinco, P. E. Fournier, E. Francavilla, M. Jensenius, J. Kazar, H. Laferl, A. Lakos, S. Lotric Furlan, M. Maurin, J. A. Oteo, P. Parola, C. Perez-Eid, O. Peter, D. Postic, D. Raoult, A. Tellez, Y. Tselentis, and B. Wilske. 2004. Guidelines for the diagnosis of tick-borne bacterial diseases in Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.10:1108-1132. 3. Three species of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B afzelii, and B. garinii) identified from cerebrospinal fluid isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and PCR 4. Cimperman, J., V. Maraspin, S. Lotrič-Furlan, E. Ružić-Sabljić, and F. Strle. 1999. Lyme meningitis: a one-year follow up controlled study. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr.111:961-963. 5. Cimperman, J., V. Maraspin, S. Lotrič-Furlan, E. Ružić-Sabljić, T. Avšič-Županc, and F. Strle. 2002. Double infection with tick borne encephalitis virus and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr.114:620-622.
Cited by
80 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|