Mycobacteriales taxonomy using network analysis-aided, context-uniform phylogenomic approach for non-subjective genus demarcation

Author:

Val-Calvo Jorge1,Vázquez-Boland José A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Microbial Pathogenesis Laboratory, Infection Medicine, Edinburgh Medical School (Biomedical Sciences), University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom

Abstract

ABSTRACT Genomics allows accurately pinpointing microbial ancestry for taxonomic purposes, yet there is currently no consensus to genus definition based on genome data. Different metrics and criteria are used, with an increasing trend toward genera over-splitting. Here, we report a method for prokaryotic genus assignment that combines normalized tree clustering and network analysis of several genomic relatedness indices. Objectivity is maximized by linear application of the same partitioning thresholds across an entire middle/high taxonomic rank context (order level), with the classical (“pre-genomic”) genera as demarcation reference, ensuring continuity in taxonomy and nomenclature. We tested the method with the Mycobacteriales , where recent examples of genus fragmentation divided Mycobacterium into five genera, or made Rhodococcus paraphyletic by creating the genus Prescottella for the sublineage containing the animal and human pathogen, Rhodococcus equi . Our approach did not support the mycobacterial five-genus split or the Prescottella nested genus, but identified a basal branch in each of the mycobacterial and rhodococcal radiations warranting genus status ( Mycobacteroides , and novel genus Rhodococcoides for the Rhodococcus fascians clade, respectively). The median average amino acid identity (AAI) between the demarcated genera was 56% to 59%, consistent with the <65% AAI genus boundary standard. Shifting the demarcation threshold to the Prescottella /mycobacterial five-genus level systematically elevated the intrageneric sublineages to genus rank, leading to taxonomic atomization (≈threefold increase in potential Mycobacteriales genera). The proposed approach provides a standardizable methodological framework for non-subjective prokaryotic genus delineation. IMPORTANCE A robust taxonomy is essential for the organized study of prokaryotes and the effective communication of microbial knowledge. The genus rank is the mainstay of biological classification as it brings together under a common name a group of closely related organisms sharing the same recent ancestry and similar characteristics. Despite the unprecedented resolution afforded by whole-genome sequencing in defining evolutionary relationships, a consensus approach for phylogenomics-based prokaryotic genus delineation remains elusive. Taxonomists use different demarcation criteria, sometimes leading to genus rank over-splitting and the creation of multiple new genera. This work reports a simple, reliable, and standardizable method that seeks to minimize subjectivity in genomics-based demarcation of prokaryotic genera, exemplified through application to the order Mycobacteriales . Formal descriptions of proposed taxonomic changes based on our study are included.

Funder

Horserace Betting Levy Board

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Virology,Microbiology

Reference71 articles.

1. Cain AJ . 1998. Taxonomy - the objectives of biological classification. In Encyclopaedia Brittanica. https://www.britannica.com/science/taxonomy/The-objectives-of-biological-classification.

2. Prokaryotic taxonomy and nomenclature in the age of big sequence data

3. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2022 Revision)

4. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities

5. Past and future species definitions for Bacteria and Archaea

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Is the bacterial genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 illegitimate? Request for an Opinion;International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology;2024-01-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3