Structural Equation Models Suggest That On-Farm Noncrop Vegetation Removal Is Not Associated with Improved Food Safety Outcomes but Is Linked to Impaired Water Quality-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Structural Equation Models Suggest That On-Farm Noncrop Vegetation Removal Is Not Associated with Improved Food Safety Outcomes but Is Linked to Impaired Water Quality

Published:2022-12-13 Issue:23 Volume:88 Page:
ISSN:0099-2240
Container-title:Applied and Environmental Microbiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Appl Environ Microbiol

Author:

Weller Daniel L.¹²^ORCID,Love Tanzy M. T.²,Weller Donald E.²,Murphy Claire M.³,Rahm Brian G.⁴,Wiedmann Martin¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

2. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA

3. Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, Maryland, USA

4. Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA

Abstract

Currently, on-farm food safety decisions are typically made independently of conservation considerations, often with detrimental impacts on agroecosystems. Comanaging agricultural environments to simultaneously meet conservation and food safety aims is complicated because farms are closely linked to surrounding environments, and management decisions can have unexpected environmental, economic, and food safety consequences.

Funder

HHS | NIH | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

CU | Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Ecology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Food Science,Biotechnology

Link

https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/aem.01600-22

Reference94 articles.

1. Food safety and environmental quality impose conflicting demands on Central Coast growers

2. Lowell K Langholz J Stuart D. 2010. Safe and sustainable: co-managing for food safety and ecological health in California’s central coast region produce safety project. https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/phg/content_level_pages/issue_briefs/pspsummarysspdf.pdf. Accessed 14 September 2022.

3. Evolving Food Safety Pressures in California's Central Coast Region

4. Beretti M. 2009. Challenges to co-management of food safety and environmental protection: a grower survey. http://www.rcdmonterey.org/pdf/Challenges_Grower_Survey_July2009.pdf. Accessed 14 September 2022.

5. Hardesty S Kusonose Y. 2009. Growers’ compliance costs for the leafy greens marketing agreement and other food safety programs. UC small farm research brief. https://ucanr.edu/sites/sfp/files/143911.pdf. Accessed 14 September 2022.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks;Landscape Ecology;2024-07-05

2. Methodological differences between studies confound one-size-fits-all approaches to managing surface waterways for food and water safety;Applied and Environmental Microbiology;2024-02-21

3. Evidence for the efficacy of pre-harvest agricultural practices in mitigating food-safety risks to fresh produce in North America;Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems;2023-05-05

4. Remote sensing of hedgerows, windbreaks, and winter cover crops in California's Central Coast reveals low adoption but hotspots of use;Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems;2023-01-25