Fifteen-Year Results of a Comparative Analysis of Tendon Repair Versus Physiotherapy for Small-to-Medium-Sized Rotator Cuff Tears

Author:

Moosmayer S.1ORCID,Lund G.2ORCID,Seljom U. Sire2ORCID,Haldorsen B.2ORCID,Svege I.C.2ORCID,Hennig T.3ORCID,Pripp A.H.4ORCID,Smith H.J.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martina Hansen’s Hospital, Gjettum, Norway

2. Department of Physiotherapy, Martina Hansen’s Hospital, Gjettum, Norway

3. Department of Occupational Therapy, Martina Hansen’s Hospital, Gjettum, Norway

4. Centre of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

5. Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Abstract: The optimal treatment for small-to-medium-sized rotator cuff tears remains a topic of debate. While both tendon repair and physiotherapy have shown comparable short-term results, there are concerns about the long-term effectiveness of physiotherapy. In 2 previous reports presenting the 5 and 10-year results of this trial, significant and increasing differences were observed in favor of tendon repair. Further investigation of the unexplored time interval after 10 years is essential to fully understand the implications of our treatment approaches. A total of 103 patients with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear not exceeding 3 cm were randomly allocated to tendon repair or physiotherapy with optional secondary repair. Measurements of shoulder function were performed by a blinded assessor at 6 months and 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 years. The outcome of primary interest was the 15-year result for the Constant score. Secondary outcome measures included the self-report section of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey; assessments of pain, motion, and strength; and patient satisfaction. Tear-size increase in unrepaired tears was assessed by sonography. Statistical analysis was by mixed-model analysis for repeated measurements and by intention to treat. Eighty-three (81%) of 103 patients attended the 15-year follow-up. Fifteen of 51 patients in the physiotherapy group had crossed over to secondary surgery. Results from primary tendon repair were superior by a mean difference of 11.8 points for the Constant score (p = 0.001), 13.9 points for the ASES score (p < 0.001), 1.8 cm on a 10-cm visual analog scale for pain (p < 0.001), and 16.2° and 22.4°, respectively, for pain-free abduction and flexion (p = 0.04 and 0.001). On the SF-36, differences did not reach significance for any of the scoring scales. In 26 tears treated by physiotherapy only, the mean tear size had increased from 16.2 to 31.6 mm in the anterior-posterior direction. Long-term outcomes from primary tendon repair remained superior to physiotherapy up to 15 years of follow-up, supporting its use as the primary treatment for small-to-medium-sized rotator cuff tears. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3