Thirty-five Years of Reporting of Sex and Race in Clinical Studies of U.S. FDA-Authorized Orthopaedic Devices

Author:

Jiang Hongying1ORCID,Kavlock Katherine1ORCID,Li Qin2ORCID,Mistry Shruti3ORCID,Hermes Valerie4ORCID,Gibbs Alonza5ORCID,Adegboyega-Panox Elizabeth1ORCID,Peat Raquel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Office of Orthopedic Devices, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland

2. Office of Clinical Evidence and Analysis, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland

3. Office of Cardiovascular Devices, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD

4. Office of Communication, Information Disclosure, Training and Education, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD

5. Office of Management, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD

Abstract

Background: At the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the mission of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) is to ensure that all patients and providers have timely and continued access to safe, effective, and high-quality medical devices and safe radiation-emitting products. Although the CDRH has observed enrollment differences in some clinical trials, no systematic analysis has been conducted regarding enrollment differences in baseline demographics, to our knowledge. Methods: The CDRH has summarized information on study participants and their baseline demographics in public-facing documentation for all authorized medical devices that involved orthopaedic clinical studies from 1985 to 2020. Descriptive analyses and exploratory statistical testing have been conducted to investigate the reported percentages by sex and race compared with those reported in the U.S. National Census and the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR), respectively. Results: We identified 94 submissions and corresponding combined clinical trials from 261 original clinical study arms with 34,193 participants. Most of the submissions reported age and sex, while only 36 submissions (38.3%) reported racial demographics. Among the 88 trials providing enrollment by sex, the female enrollment percentage ranged from 22.2% to 88.7%, with a mean of 55.0%. In the submissions that reported racial data (38.3%), White and Black patients had a mean enrollment of 89.2% (range, 64.8% to 98.7%) and 6.2% (range, 0.4% to 20.7%), respectively. The enrollment for other minority groups ranged from 0% to 3.0%. These clinical trials have shown numerically lower female representation (55.0%) but higher White representation (89.2%) than what has been reported in the AJRR. The other racial groups have participated much less than their corresponding percentages in the U.S. population, but they are similarly represented in the AJRR. Conclusions: The clinical trials supporting the FDA’s authorization of orthopaedic devices had a wide range of sex and racial enrollments. It appears that female enrollment mirrors the percentage of women in the U.S. population. However, despite prior efforts, some racial groups are still underrepresented. The FDA has made a commitment to advancing health equity as part of the 2022-2025 Strategic Priorities of the CDRH. We hope that the results of this study will help health-care professionals make informed clinical decisions when using medical devices.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference21 articles.

1. Evaluation of Sex-Specific Data in Medical Device Clinical Studies;Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff.,2014

2. Collection of Race and Ethnicity Data in Clinical Trials;Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff.,2016

3. Is Our Science Representative? A Systematic Review of Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials from 2000 to 2020;Cwalina;Clin Orthop Relat Res.,2022

4. Uneven global and racial representation in major orthopaedic clinical trials: Trends over a decade;George;J Clin Orthop Trauma.,2022

5. Are orthopedic clinical trials representative? An analysis of race and ethnicity reported in clinical trials between 2007 and 2022;Hecht;Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.,2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3