Bilateral External Torque CT Reliably Detects Syndesmotic Lesions in an Experimental Cadaveric Study

Abstract

Background: If tibiofibular syndesmotic injury is undetected, chronic instability may lead to persistent pain and osteoarthritis. So far, no reliable diagnostic method has been available. The primary objectives of this study were to determine whether defined lesions of the syndesmosis can be correlated with specific tibiofibular joint displacements caused by external rotational torque and to compare the performance of bilateral external torque computed tomography (BET-CT) and arthroscopy. Secondary objectives included an evaluation of the reliability of CT measurements and the suitability of the healthy contralateral ankle as a reference. Methods: Seven pairs of healthy, cadaveric lower legs were tested and assigned to 2 groups: (1) supination-external rotation (SER) and (2) pronation-external rotation (PER). In the intact state and after each surgical step, an ankle arthroscopy and 3 CT scans were performed. During the scans, the specimens were placed in an external torque device with 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 Nm of torque applied. Results: The arthroscopic and CT parameters showed significant correlations in all pairwise comparisons. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses yielded the best prediction of syndesmotic instability with the anterior tibiofibular distance on CT, with a sensitivity of 84.1% and a specificity of 95.2% (area under the curve [AUC], 94.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.916 to 0.979; p < 0.0001) and with the middle tibiofibular distance on arthroscopy, with a sensitivity of 76.2% and specificity of 92.3% (AUC, 91.2%; 95% CI, 0.837 to 0.987; p < 0.0001). Higher torque amounts increased the rate of true-positive results. Conclusions: BET-CT reliably detects experimental syndesmotic rotational instability, compared with the healthy side, with greater sensitivity and similar specificity compared with the arthroscopic lateral hook test. Translation of these experimental findings to clinical practice remains to be established. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.