Abstract
In this paper, I address Max Delbrück’s conceptual and experimental importance for molecular biology (henceforth MB) origins. In particular, his complementarity approach and its anti-reductive implications on the (epistemic) reductionism debate in MB.
Regarding Delbrück’s conceptual and experimental importance, I examine his influence on the development of MB by exploring a shift of his interests from physics to biology. Particularly, I outline his central role in “The Phage Group”, the informal group of scientists examining the origin of hereditary life using bacteriophages as their experimental model of choice. Delbrück and “The Phage Group” greatly influenced the development of MB, which culminated with the shared 1969 Nobel Prize for the discoveries regarding replication mechanism and genetic structure of viruses.
Moreover, I examine Delbrück’s complementarity approach towards biological explanations. The complementarity in biology assumes that “biological phenomena might require the employment of descriptions that are mutually exclusive yet jointly necessary for understanding life processes” (McKaughan 2011, p. 11). I explore Delbrück’s complementarity approach, in particular the debate between the reductive and anti-reductive interpretations of it. I argue for the latter interpretation by suggesting that Delbrück advanced an anti-reductive view towards biological explanations by advocating for independent status of explanations of various biological disciplines. Furthermore, I address the complementarity approach in the light of the anti-reductive interpretation in the recent developments in MB, particularly, the potentiality of finding the complementarity approach in systems biology, epigenetics, and boundary selection.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science
Reference37 articles.
1. 1. Bala, Arun 2017: Complementarity Beyond Physics: Niels Bohr's Parallels. Palgrave Macmillan.
2. 2. Bechtel, William; Richardson, Robert 2010: Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. 3. Bohr, Niels 1933: Light and Life. Nature 131, pp. 421-423, 457-459. DOI: 10.1038/131457a0.
4. 4. Brigandt, Ingo; Love, Alan 2022: Reductionism in Biology, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/reduction-biology/.
5. 5. Darden, Lindley 2005: Relations Among Fields: Mendelian, Cytological and Molecular Mechanisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36, pp. 349-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.007.