Real-time Perspectives of Surrogate Decision-Makers Regarding Critical Illness Research-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Real-time Perspectives of Surrogate Decision-Makers Regarding Critical Illness Research

Published:2012-12 Issue:6 Volume:142 Page:1433-1439
ISSN:0012-3692
Container-title:Chest
language:en
Short-container-title:Chest

Author:

Iverson Ellen,Celious Aaron,Kennedy Carie R.,Shehane Erica,Eastman Alexander,Warren Victoria,Bolcic-Jankovic Dragana,Clarridge Brian,Freeman Bradley D.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. The ethical conduct of clinical research involving critically ill patients in the United States and Canada: principles and recommendations;Luce;Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2004

2. Safeguarding patients in clinical trials with high mortality rates;Freeman;Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2001

3. Improving the process of informed consent in the critically ill;Davis;JAMA,2003

4. Research ethics and consent in the intensive care unit;Luce;Curr Opin Crit Care,2003

5. Is the concept of informed consent applicable to clinical research involving critically ill patients?;Luce;Crit Care Med,2003

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Barriers and Facilitators of Surrogates Providing Consent for Critically Ill Patients in Clinical Trials;CHEST;2024-08

2. ‘It’s not making a decision, it’s prompting the discussions’: a qualitative study exploring stakeholders’ views on the acceptability and feasibility of advance research planning (CONSULT-ADVANCE);BMC Medical Ethics;2024-07-23

3. ‘It’s not making a decision, it’s prompting the discussions’: a qualitative study exploring stakeholders’ views on the acceptability and feasibility of advance research planning (CONSULT-ADVANCE);2024-04-09

4. (Re)Conceptualising ‘good’ proxy decision-making for research: the implications for proxy consent decision quality;BMC Medical Ethics;2022-07-18

5. A systematic review and meta-analysis of enrollment into ARDS and sepsis trials published between 2009 and 2019 in major journals;Critical Care;2021-11-15