Abstract
Background and objectivesNew payment models resulting from the Advancing American Kidney Health initiative may create incentives for nephrologists to focus less on face-to-face in-center hemodialysis visits. This study aimed to understand whether more frequent nephrology practitioner dialysis visits improved patient experience and could help inform future policy.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsIn a cross-sectional study of patients receiving dialysis from April 1, 2015 through January 31, 2016, we linked patient records from a national kidney failure registry to patient experience data from the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. We used a multivariable mixed effects linear regression model to examine the association between nephrology practitioner visit frequency and patient-reported experiences with nephrologist care.ResultsAmong 5125 US dialysis facilities, 2981 (58%) had ≥30 In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys completed between April 2015 and January 2016, and 243,324 patients receiving care within these facilities had Medicare Parts A/B coverage. Face-to-face practitioner visits per month were 71% with four or more visits, 17% with two to three visits, 4% with one visit, and 8% with no visits. Each 10% absolute greater proportion of patients seen by their nephrology practitioner(s) four or more times per month was associated with a modestly but statistically significant lower score of patient experience with nephrologist care by −0.3 points (95% confidence interval, −0.5 to −0.1) and no effect on experience with other domains of dialysis care.ConclusionsIn an analysis of patient experiences at the dialysis facility level, frequent nephrology practitioner visits to facilities where patients undergo outpatient hemodialysis were not associated with better patient experiences.
Funder
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development (VA HSR&D) Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety
Publisher
American Society of Nephrology (ASN)
Subject
Transplantation,Nephrology,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Epidemiology
Reference50 articles.
1. How end-stage renal disease (ESRD)-Medicare developed
2. Patient satisfaction in pay for performance programs;Press;Qual Manag Health Care,2011
3. Medicare program; end-stage renal disease quality incentive program. Final rule;Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS;Fed Regist,2011
4. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, 2001. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222274/. Accessed December 3, 2019
5. Pay-For-Performance: The MedPAC Perspective