Pilot Study of Return of Genetic Results to Patients in Adult Nephrology

Author:

Nestor Jordan G.ORCID,Marasa MaddalenaORCID,Milo-Rasouly Hila,Groopman Emily E.,Husain S. AliORCID,Mohan SumitORCID,Fernandez HildaORCID,Aggarwal Vimla S.,Ahram Dina F.,Vena Natalie,Bogyo Kelsie,Bomback Andrew S.,Radhakrishnan Jai,Appel Gerald B.,Ahn WooinORCID,Cohen David J.,Canetta Pietro A.ORCID,Dube Geoffrey K.,Rao Maya K.,Morris Heather K.,Crew Russell J.,Sanna-Cherchi Simone,Kiryluk Krzysztof,Gharavi Ali G.

Abstract

Background and objectivesActionable genetic findings have implications for care of patients with kidney disease, and genetic testing is an emerging tool in nephrology practice. However, there are scarce data regarding best practices for return of results and clinical application of actionable genetic findings for kidney patients.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsWe developed a return of results workflow in collaborations with clinicians for the retrospective recontact of adult nephrology patients who had been recruited into a biobank research study for exome sequencing and were identified to have medically actionable genetic findings.ResultsUsing this workflow, we attempted to recontact a diverse pilot cohort of 104 nephrology research participants with actionable genetic findings, encompassing 34 different monogenic etiologies of nephropathy and five single-gene disorders recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics for return as medically actionable secondary findings. We successfully recontacted 64 (62%) participants and returned results to 41 (39%) individuals. In each case, the genetic diagnosis had meaningful implications for the patients’ nephrology care. Through implementation efforts and qualitative interviews with providers, we identified over 20 key challenges associated with returning results to study participants, and found that physician knowledge gaps in genomics was a recurrent theme. We iteratively addressed these challenges to yield an optimized workflow, which included standardized consultation notes with tailored management recommendations, monthly educational conferences on core topics in genomics, and a curated list of expert clinicians for patients requiring extranephrologic referrals.ConclusionsDeveloping the infrastructure to support return of genetic results in nephrology was resource-intensive, but presented potential opportunities for improving patient care.PodcastThis article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2020_04_16_12481019.mp3

Funder

National Institutes of Health

American Society of Nephrology Foundation for Kidney Research Donald E. Wesson Research Fellowship

Renal Research Institute University Grants

Columbia Precision Medicine Initiative

Publisher

American Society of Nephrology (ASN)

Subject

Transplantation,Nephrology,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Epidemiology

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3