Trainee Love and Breakup Letters to NephSIM

Author:

Fattah Layla1ORCID,Thomas David C.2ORCID,Sparks Matthew A.3ORCID,Farouk Samira S.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The Institutes for Translational Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

2. Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

3. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine and Renal Section, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina

4. Barbara T. Murphy Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

Abstract

Background It is not known how learners feel about free open access medical education (FOAMed) as they progress through their training from medical school to fellowship. Love and breakup letter methodology (LBM) is a technique that has been used extensively in user experience technology-based research but has not previously been used in evaluating medical education tools. LBM asks participants to creatively write a “love” or “breakup” letter to a product under study to capture their thoughts and emotions when engaging with it. We conducted qualitative analysis of data from focus groups to explore how attitudes toward a learning platform change at various training stages and to broaden our understanding of how we meet learners' needs through a nephrology FOAMed tool, NephSIM. Methods Three virtual, recorded focus groups were conducted with second-year medical students, internal medicine residents, and nephrology fellows (N=18). At the start of the focus group, participants composed and read their love and breakup letters. Semistructured discussions were then led by facilitator-driven questions and peer comments. After transcription, inductive data analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis. Results Four main themes were seen across all groups: attitudes toward teaching tool, perception of nephrology, learning needs and approach, and application to practice. Preclinical students positively viewed the opportunity to simulate the clinical setting and unanimously wrote love letters. Reactions from residents and fellows were mixed. Residents were interested in brevity and speed of learning, preferring algorithms and succinct approaches to meet their practice-based learning needs. Fellows' learning needs were driven by a desire to prepare for the nephrology board examination and review cases uncommonly seen in practice. Conclusions LBM provided a valuable methodology through which to identify trainee reactions to a FOAMed tool and highlighted the challenges of meeting learning needs of a continuum of trainees with a single learning platform.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Transplantation,Nephrology,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Epidemiology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Simulation-based learning in nephrology;Clinical Kidney Journal;2024-03-12

2. Applying Scientific Rigor to Medical Education in the FOAMed Era;Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology;2023-07-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3