Advanced technologies for treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis: differentiated approach

Author:

Gallyamov E. A.1ORCID,Agapov M. A.2ORCID,Lutsevich O. E.3ORCID,Kakotkin V. V.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

2. Lomonosov Moscow State University

3. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Abstract

This work is based on analysis of publications devoted to the problem of surgical approach to treatment of acute pancreatitis over the last 30 years. The main aim of this review is to identify the key steps of evolution of surgical approach to treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis and also to determine the most promising approach among existing methods. The analysis of the most modern clinical recommendations adopted in different countries of the world, as well as the search for such problems, the solution of which will be the main task of world medical science in the near future, is carried out. It has been established that medical communities of different countries give preference to minimally invasive methods of debridement: percutaneous and transluminal endoscopic drainage. According to the most advanced recommendations, the method of choice for surgical treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis is transluminal endoscopic drainage, with inefficiency – percutaneous puncture drainage. The main idea that defines the search vector for treatment methods for the disease is the recognition of the fact that all surgical approaches are aimed at achieving one goal – removing the maximum possible volume of necrotic masses with minimal damage to surrounding tissues. Only a method that satisfies both requirements can be recognized as leading.

Publisher

Annals of Surgical Hepatology

Subject

Gastroenterology,Hepatology,Surgery

Reference46 articles.

1. Roberts S.E., Morrison-Rees S., John A., Williams J.G., Brown T.H., Samuel D.G. The incidence and aetiology of acute pancreatitis across Europe. Pancreatology. 2017; 17 (2): 155–165.

2. Banks P.A., Bollen T.L., Dervenis C., Gooszen H.G., Johnson C.D., Sarr M.G., Tsiotos G.G., Vege S.S. Classification of acute pancreatitis – 2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013; 62 (1): 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779.

3. Büchler M.W., Gloor B., Müller C.A., Friess H., Seiler C.A., Uhl W. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: treatment strategy according to the status of infection. Ann. Surg. 2000; 232 (5): 619–626.

4. Renner I.G., Savage W.T., Pantoja J.L., Renner V.J. Death due to acute pancreatitis. A retrospective analysis of 405 autopsy cases. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1985; 30 (10): 1005–1018.

5. Runkel N.S., Rodriguez L.F., Moody F.G. Mechanisms of sepsis in acute pancreatitis in opossums. Am. J. Surg. 1995; 169 (2): 227–232.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Rare Observation of Endoscopic Transluminal Drainage of Pancreatogenic Destruction Areas in Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis;Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care";2023-04-17

2. Results of using transfistula videoscopic necrosequestrectomy to treat purulent-necrotic parapancreatitis;Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery;2022-06-07

3. Local cryotherapy on the pancreas with pancreatic necrosis: Results of the experimental study;Acta Biomedica Scientifica;2022-03-21

4. Surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis;Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery;2022-02-09

5. Endoscopic transluminal drainage for infected pancreatic necrosis;Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3