2016–2017 Central Italy Earthquake Sequence: Seismic Retrofit Policy and Effectiveness

Author:

Mazzoni Silvia1,Castori Giulio2,Galasso Carmine3,Calvi Paolo4,Dreyer Richard5,Fischer Erica6,Fulco Alessandro2,Sorrentino Luigi7,Wilson Jay8,Penna Andrea9,Magenes Guido9

Affiliation:

1. University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA

2. Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Universita’ degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy

3. University College London, London, United Kingdom

4. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

5. Holmes Structures, 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1250, San Francisco, CA 94104

6. Department of Civil & Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR

7. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Strutturale e Geotecnica, Universita’ di Roma Sapienza, Rome, Italy

8. Clackamas County, Oregon City, OR

9. EUCENTRE, Pavia, Italy

Abstract

The 2016–2017 Central Italy earthquake sequence consisted of several moderately high-magnitude earthquakes, between M5.5 and M6.5, each centered in a different location and with its own sequences of aftershocks spanning several months. To study the effects of this earthquake sequence on the built environment and the impact on the communities, a collaborative reconnaissance effort was organized by the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), the Eucentre Foundation, the European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (EUCentre), and the Rete dei Laboratori Universitari di Ingegneria Sismica (ReLuis). The effort consisted of two reconnaissance missions: one following the Amatrice Earthquake of 24 August 2016 and one after the end of the earthquake sequence, in May 2017. One objective of the reconnaissance effort was to evaluate existing strengthening methodologies and assess their effectiveness in mitigating the damaging effects of ground shaking. Parallel studies by the Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance (GEER) Association, presented in a companion paper, demonstrate that variations in-ground motions due to topographic site effects had a significant impact on damage distribution in the affected area. This paper presents that, in addition to these ground motion variations, variations in the vulnerability of residential and critical facilities were observed to have a significant impact on the level of damage in the region. The damage to the historical centers of Amatrice and Norcia will be used in this evaluation: the historical center of Amatrice was devastated by the sequence of earthquakes; the significant damage in Norcia was localized to individual buildings. Amatrice has not experienced the same number of devastating earthquakes as Norcia in the last 150 years. As a result, its building stock is much older than that of Norcia and there appeared to be little visual evidence of strengthening of the buildings. The distribution of damage observed throughout the region was found to be indicative of the effectiveness of strengthening and of the need for a comprehensive implementation of retrofit policies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Geophysics,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Reference10 articles.

1. Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance (GEER) Association, 2016. Engineering reconnaissance of the 24 August 2016 Central Italy earthquake, Version 2 (ZimmaroP. and StewartJ. P., eds.), Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance Association Report No. GEER-050B. doi:10.18118/G61S3Z.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3