“Don’t Call on Me!”: Mediating Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Mathematics Anxiety in a Problem-Based Classroom-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

“Don’t Call on Me!”: Mediating Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Mathematics Anxiety in a Problem-Based Classroom

Published:2024-04 Issue:2 Volume:16 Page:83-95
ISSN:1944-0413
Container-title:Excelsior: Leadership in Teaching and Learning
language:
Short-container-title:Excelsior

Author:

Griffin David¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nova Southeastern University

Abstract

This paper examines various approaches to evaluating the classroom teacher and discusses the inclusion of dispositions in the evaluation process. A random sample of 150 teachers were asked to complete an online survey focusing on the inclusion of dispositions in their formal evaluations. They were asked to report what specific dispositions were evaluated, and if the specific dispositions were operationally defined. A summary of their responses to the survey items is discussed.

Publisher

Syracuse University Libraries

Reference39 articles.

1. Almerico, G., Johnston, P., Henriott, D., and Shapiro, M. (2011). Dispositions assessment in teacher education: developing an assessment instrument for the college classroom and the field. Research in Higher Education Journal, 1-19. Retrieved from http://aabri.com/manuscripts/10665.pdf

2. Amrein-Beardsley, A. and Holloway, J. (2017). Value-Added Models for Teacher Evaluation and Accountability: Commonsense Assumptions. Educational Policy 33(1). doi: 10.1177/0895904817719519.

3. Berliner, D., and Glass, G. V. (2014). Chipping away reforms that don’t make a difference. Educational Leadership, 71(9), 28-33.

4. Brandt, R. (1996). On a new direction for teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 30-33.

5. Cannata, M., Rubin, M., Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Neumerski, C., Drake, T., and Schuermann, P. (2017). Using teacher effectiveness data for information rich hiring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(2).