SOLUBLE ST2 AND CD163 AS POTENTIALBIOMARKERS TO DIFFERENTIATE PRIMARY HEMOPHAGOCYTIC LYMPHOHISTIOCYTOSIS FROM MACROPHAGE ACTIVATION SYNDROME

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objective: The differentiation of primary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (pHLH) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) poses a challenge to hematologists. The aim of this study was (1) to compare the levels of soluble ST2 (sST2), sCD163, IL-10, IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-18 in patients with pHLH and MAS and (2) to investigate whether they can help differentiate the two diseases. Methods: A total of 54 participants were recruited in this study, including 12 pHLH patients, 22 MAS patients and 20 healthy subjects. We measured the levels of sST2 and sCD163 in serum by ELISA. The serum levels of IL-10, IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-18 were detected using a Luminex 200 instrument. Results: The serum levels of sST2 and sCD163 in MAS patients were markedly higher than that in pHLH patients (363.13 ± 307.24 ng/ml vs 80.75 ± 87.04 ng/ml, P = 0.004; 3532.72 ± 2479.68 ng/ml vs 1731.96 ± 1262.07 ng/ml, P = 0.046). There was no significant difference in the expression of IFN-γ (306.89 ± 281.60 pg/ml vs 562.43 ± 399.86 pg/ml), IL-10 (20.40 ± 30.49 pg/ml vs 8.3 ± 13.14 pg/ml), IL-18 (463.33 ± 597.04 pg/ml vs 1247.82 ± 1318.58 pg/ml) and TNF-α (61.48 ± 84.69 pg/ml vs 106.10 ±77.21 pg/ml) between pHLH and MAS. Conclusion: Patients with pHLH and MAS show some differences in cytokine profiles. The elevated levels of IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-18 and TNF-α can contribute to the diagnosis of HLH, but may not discriminate pHLH from MAS. Levels of sST2 and sCD163 may serve as markers to distinguish pHLH from MAS.