How Formal Versus Semantic Gender Influences the Interpretation of Person Denotations

Author:

Irmen Lisa1,Roßberg Nadja1

Affiliation:

1. University of St. Gallen, Switzerland

Abstract

Two studies assessed how gender-marked person denotations in German are interpreted in contrast to their unmarked counterparts in English. Participants read sentences about national groups denoted by nouns of masculine gender in German (Experiment 1) and by gender-unmarked nouns in English (Experiment 2). These statements were followed by a sentence that contained a reference to the subject of the first sentence and expressed either stereotypically feminine, stereotypically masculine, or gender-neutral content. Reading times for the second sentences indicate the ease of reference resolution which depends on the fit between the first sentence’s subject and the gender relatedness of the second sentence. Results show that grammatical gender in German slowed down the reading of information that was mismatched as to gender. No effect occurred in the English study. Results are discussed in terms of the theoretical framework of scenario mapping and focus ( Sanford & Garrod, 1981 , 1998 ).

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

General Psychology

Reference31 articles.

1. Braun, F. Gottburgsen, A. Sczesny, S. Stahlberg, D. (1998). Können Geophysiker Frauen sein? Generische Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen [Can geophysicists be women? Generic nouns referring to persons in German]. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 26– 265– 283

2. Bußmann, H. Hellinger, M. (2003). German. Engendering female visibility in German. In M. Hellinger & H. Bußmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, Vol. 3 (pp. 141-174). Amsterdam: Benjamins

3. What has gender got to do with sex?

4. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press

5. Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: University Press

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3