Affiliation:
1. School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
2. Dept. of Exper. Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Abstract
Summary: Survey and interview studies have identified the existence of a number of systems of financial organization in marriage, but their origins remain a mystery. One possibility is that people develop normative beliefs that are carried forward into marriage. The present questionnaire study aimed to elucidate such beliefs by means of the responses of 408 undergraduates to one of five different vignettes, each containing a choice dilemma. Each vignette described a couple of recent graduates about to get married, with particular income levels that varied across the five versions. Respondents were asked to select the “best” system of financial management from six possibilities, to rank the possibilities in order of fairness, to decide whether or not one partner should have more personal spending money (PSM) than the other, and to explain their answers where relevant. While the differences between vignettes had some impact on the system chosen, the commonest choice was for one in which all income was pooled. Moreover, two-thirds of the sample believed that each partner should receive an equal amount of PSM. A predominant feature of the findings was a belief that financial organization in marriage should be governed by a norm of equality, though independence and autonomy were also seen as important by some.
Subject
General Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference17 articles.
1. Becker, G.S.
(1993).
A treatise on the family. .
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
.
2. Money in Marriage: How Patterns of Allocation Both Reflect and Conceal Power
3. Distributive justice in marriage: Equality or equity?
4. Money in Remarriage: Keeping Things Simple — And Separate
5. Clark, M.S.
Chrisman, K.
(1994).
Resource allocation in intimate relationships: Trying to
make sense of a confusing literature.
In M.J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.),
Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close
relationships (pp.65-88). New York:
Plenum.
.
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献