Affiliation:
1. Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, ETHIOPIA
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of blended physics laboratory experimentation on pre-service physics teachers’ (PSPTs’) understanding of the nature of science (NOS) during an electricity and magnetism laboratory course. The study used a non-equivalent comparison group using a pre-test-post-test quasi-experimental design that contrasted blended, virtual, and real mode of physics experimentations. A total of 63 PSPTs, 16 in blended experimental group, 26 in virtual experimental group, and 21 in real experimental group, participated in the study. Except for the type of manipulatives, the experiments in all the three cases were the same. Quantitative Likert-type questions were administered before and after the intervention and open-ended questions were administered after the intervention. The quantitative data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and ANCOVA, while the qualitative data were categorized under naïve, mixed, and informed views. The results revealed that experimenting with blended, virtual, and real manipulatives were found to be ineffective in enhancing understanding of NOS on the PSPTs’. Apart from the type of experiment used, it was suggested that adequate consideration be paid to NOS issues in the laboratory courses in order to obtain well-educated and trained physics teachers.
Reference64 articles.
1. Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: The impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning. International Journal of Science education, 27(1), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690410001673810
2. Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-C
3. Afriani, T. A. (2019). The effect of guided inquiry laboratory activity with video embedded on students’ understanding and motivation in learning light and optics. Journal of Science Learning, 2(4), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i3.15144
4. Agustian, H. Y. (2020). Students’ understanding of the nature of science in the context of an undergraduate chemistry laboratory. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 24(2), 56-85.
5. Akani, O. (2015). Laboratory teaching: Implication on students’ achievement in chemistry in secondary schools in Ebonyi State of Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(30), 206-213.