The old new theory of modern Russian psychiatry: a biopsychosocial approach (institutional discourse)

Author:

Nosachev G. N.1ORCID,Nosachev I. G.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Samara State Medical University

Abstract

The article is discussed («Review of psychiatry and medical psychology named after V.M. Bekhterev». 2020; 2: 3-15), which examines the biopsychosocial model as the theoretical basis (scientific, clinical, preventive, therapeutic) of modern psychiatry, in particular, the biological (genetic) domain.The purpose of the discourse: from the standpoint of philosophy and methodology of science, to determine the place of the biological domain (biomedical research) of the biopsychosocial (biopsychosocial—spiritual) (BPS) approach (theory) in Russian psychiatry, in particular, from the standpoint of the subject of psychiatry and its main section-clinical psychiatry.Based on methodology and philosophy, and based on anthropological and holistic approaches, the biological domain of the BPS model, which is based on clinical psychiatry as a practice and, accordingly, theory, is discussed through the subject of psychiatry as a science. The significance and role of the subject of psychiatry (pathology, disorders, abnormalities of mental activity) in the ICD-10 and the components of the biopsychosocial (model) approach are discussed. There are differences in the domains of the model and the difficulties of clinical diagnosis (multi-axis, functional, multidimensional) and, accordingly, the study of the etiopathogenesis of mental disorders, the "bias" of diagnosis and therapy. The article deals with the neurological component of the biological domain and the "expansion" of neurologists into psychiatry, which leads to hidden antipsychiatry. The author emphasizes the independence, contiguity and two-paradigm nature of psychiatry as a science (with its own unity of subject and its own method of research—clinical and psychopathological). In addition to the interdisciplinarity of clinical neuroscience, it is proposed to be multidisciplinary (for the sections of psychiatry), but the future belongs to the transdisciplinary research methodology.

Publisher

V.M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology

Reference33 articles.

1. Asmolov AG, Shekhter E.D, Chernorizov AM. What is life from the point of view of psychology: a historical and evolutionary approach to the psychophysical problem. Voprosy psikhologii. 2016; 2:3-24. (In Russ.).

2. Guseltseva MS. A transdisciplinary approach to contemporary psychology. Voprosy psikhologii. 2018; 4:3–12. (In Russ.).

3. Kanke V.A. Filosofiya nauki. Kratkij enciklopedicheskij slovar’. M.: Omega-L. 2008. (In Russ.).

4. Kanke V.A. Obshchaya filosofiya nauki: uchebnik. M.: Omega-L. 2009. (In Russ.).

5. Kanke V.A. Special’naya filosofiya nauki. Enciklopedicheskij slovar’. M.: INFRA-M. 2020. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3