Diagnostic value and utility of commonly used biomarkers of cardiac and renal function in cardiorenal syndromes

Abstract

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS), first defined in 2004 as a consequence of the interactions between the kidneys and other circulatory departments leading to acute heart failure, has since been recognized as a complex clinical entity that is hard to define, diagnose and classify. The framework for the classification of CRS according to pathophysiologic background was laid out in 2008, dividing CRS into five distinct phenotypes. However, determining the timing of individual organ injuries and making a diagnosis of either renal or cardiac failure remains an elusive task. In clinical practice, the diagnosis and phenotyping of CRS is mostly based on using laboratory biomarkers in order to directly or indirectly estimate the degree of end-organ functional decline. Therefore, a well-educated clinician should be aware of the effects that the reduction of renal and cardiac function has on the diagnostic and predictive value and properties of the most commonly used biomarkers (e.g. troponins, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, serum creatinine etc). They should also be acquainted, on a basic level, with emerging biomarkers that are specific to either the degree of glomerular integrity (cystatin C) or tubular injury (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin). This narrative review aims to provide a scoping overview of the different roles that biomarkers play in both the diagnosis of CRS and the prognosis of the disease in patients who have been diagnosed with it, along with highlighting the most important pitfalls in their interpretation in the context of impaired renal and/or cardiac function.