Values in Social Work and Professional Relationship Towards Users

Author:

Šćepović Dragana1,Lepir Ljubo1,Šućur-Janjetović Vesna1

Affiliation:

1. University of Banja Luka

Abstract

The paper presents the results of comparative empirical research conducted among social work students (N=146), who were grouped into two subsamples: students from the Australian College of Applied Psychology, Sydney and Melbourne (N= 71), and students from Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) from the Universities of Banja Luka, Tuzla and Sarajevo (N=75). The subject of the research was the values in social work that determine the professional attitude and ways of intervening towards the users of the social protection system, among social work students in two different educational, cultural, and social-political environments (Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina). The goal of the research was to determine whether there are differences in the attitudes and opinions of students about the values of social work, professional attitudes, and actions towards users of the social protection system, about the country of study and residence. The research was carried out using the research method (survey technique), for the needs of which a specially prepared instrument - Questionnaire (ORiSR/April 2020) was created, which examined students' attitudes about the professional relationship and measures of treatment towards users of social work services. The obtained results confirmed the assumed hypothesis that there are significant differences in students' attitudes regarding the place of study, that is, the different cultural and social circumstances in which future social workers are educated. Differences were observed in the evaluation of individual measures and forms of protection for users of social work services. Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina believe that adoption and foster care are preferable forms of protection for children without parental care, while the majority of students from Australia think that the adoption of children in same-sex unions should be allowed. Also, the obtained results showed that, even though the views of students from Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina differ on some values of social work, essential differences were not observed in the values related to satisfying the primary interest of the user, subordinating personal principles to the values of social work and social activism of social work in the community.

Publisher

University of Tuzla

Subject

General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Alston, Margaret, Samone McCurdy, Jennifer McKinnon (2018), Social Work Fields of Practice, 3, Oxford University Press, Melbourne

2. Australian Association of Social Workers (2020), Australian Social Work Education and Accreditation Standards; preuzeto 20. 02. 2023. sa https://www.aasw.asn.au

3. Australian Association of Social Workers (2020), Code of Ethics; preuzeto 20. 02. 2023. sa https://www.aasw.asn.au/about-aasw/ethics-standards/code- of-ethics/

4. Australian Association of Social Workers (2013), Practice standards; preuzeto 20. 02. 2023. sa: https://www.aasw.asn.au/about-aasw/ethics-standards/prac- tice-standards/

5. Australian Association of Social Workers (2010), Code of Ethics; preuzeto 20. 02. 2023. sa https://www.aasw.asn.au

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3