Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background

Author:

Agazie G.ORCID,Antoniadis J.ORCID,Anumarlapudi A.ORCID,Archibald A. M.ORCID,Arumugam P.ORCID,Arumugam S.ORCID,Arzoumanian Z.,Askew J.,Babak S.ORCID,Bagchi M.ORCID,Bailes M.ORCID,Nielsen A.-S. BakORCID,Baker P. T.ORCID,Bassa C. G.ORCID,Bathula A.ORCID,Bécsy B.ORCID,Berthereau A.,Bhat N. D. R.ORCID,Blecha L.ORCID,Bonetti M.ORCID,Bortolas E.ORCID,Brazier A.ORCID,Brook P. R.ORCID,Burgay M.ORCID,Burke-Spolaor S.ORCID,Burnette R.,Caballero R. N.ORCID,Cameron A.ORCID,Case R.,Chalumeau A.ORCID,Champion D. J.ORCID,Chanlaridis S.ORCID,Charisi M.ORCID,Chatterjee S.ORCID,Chatziioannou K.,Cheeseboro B. D.,Chen S.ORCID,Chen Z.-C.ORCID,Cognard I.ORCID,Cohen T.ORCID,Coles W. A.,Cordes J. M.ORCID,Cornish N. J.ORCID,Crawford F.ORCID,Cromartie H. T.ORCID,Crowter K.ORCID,Curyło M.ORCID,Cutler C. J.ORCID,Dai S.,Dandapat S.ORCID,Deb D.ORCID,DeCesar M. E.ORCID,DeGan D.,Demorest P. B.ORCID,Deng H.,Desai S.ORCID,Desvignes G.ORCID,Dey L.ORCID,Dhanda-Batra N.,Di Marco V.ORCID,Dolch T.ORCID,Drachler B.,Dwivedi C.ORCID,Ellis J. A.,Falxa M.,Feng Y.,Ferdman R. D.,Ferrara E. C.ORCID,Fiore W.ORCID,Fonseca E.ORCID,Franchini A.ORCID,Freedman G. E.ORCID,Gair J. R.ORCID,Garver-Daniels N.ORCID,Gentile P. A.ORCID,Gersbach K. A.,Glaser J.ORCID,Good D. C.ORCID,Goncharov B.ORCID,Gopakumar A.ORCID,Graikou E.,Griessmeier J.-M.ORCID,Guillemot L.ORCID,Gültekin K.ORCID,Guo Y. J.,Gupta Y.ORCID,Grunthal K.ORCID,Hazboun J. S.ORCID,Hisano S.ORCID,Hobbs G. B.ORCID,Hourihane S.ORCID,Hu H.ORCID,Iraci F.,Islo K.,Izquierdo-Villalba D.ORCID,Jang J.ORCID,Jawor J.ORCID,Janssen G. H.ORCID,Jennings R. J.ORCID,Jessner A.ORCID,Johnson A. D.ORCID,Jones M. L.ORCID,Joshi B. C.ORCID,Kaiser A. R.ORCID,Kaplan D. L.ORCID,Kapur A.ORCID,Kareem F.ORCID,Karuppusamy R.ORCID,Keane E. F.ORCID,Keith M. J.ORCID,Kelley L. Z.ORCID,Kerr M.ORCID,Key J. S.ORCID,Kharbanda D.ORCID,Kikunaga T.ORCID,Klein T. C.,Kolhe N.ORCID,Kramer M.,Krishnakumar M. A.ORCID,Kulkarni A.,Laal N.ORCID,Lackeos K.ORCID,Lam M. T.ORCID,Lamb W. G.ORCID,Larsen B. B.ORCID,Lazio T. J. W.,Lee K. J.,Levin Y.,Lewandowska N.ORCID,Littenberg T. B.ORCID,Liu K.,Liu T.ORCID,Liu Y.ORCID,Lommen A.ORCID,Lorimer D. R.ORCID,Lower M. E.ORCID,Luo J.ORCID,Luo R.,Lynch R. S.ORCID,Lyne A. G.,Ma C.-P.ORCID,Maan Y.,Madison D. R.ORCID,Main R. A.,Manchester R. N.ORCID,Mandow R.ORCID,Mattson M. A.,McEwen A.ORCID,McKee J. W.ORCID,McLaughlin M. A.ORCID,McMann N.ORCID,Meyers B. W.ORCID,Meyers P. M.ORCID,Mickaliger M. B.ORCID,Miles M.ORCID,Mingarelli C. M. F.ORCID,Mitridate A.ORCID,Natarajan P.ORCID,Nathan R. S.ORCID,Ng C.ORCID,Nice D. J.ORCID,Niţu I. C.ORCID,Nobleson K.ORCID,Ocker S. K.ORCID,Olum K. D.ORCID,Osłowski S.ORCID,Paladi A. K.ORCID,Parthasarathy A.ORCID,Pennucci T. T.ORCID,Perera B. B. P.ORCID,Perrodin D.ORCID,Petiteau A.ORCID,Petrov P.ORCID,Pol N. S.ORCID,Porayko N. K.,Possenti A.,Prabu T.,Leclere H. Quelquejay,Radovan H. A.ORCID,Rana P.ORCID,Ransom S. M.ORCID,Ray P. S.ORCID,Reardon D. J.ORCID,Rogers A. F.,Romano J. D.ORCID,Russell C. J.ORCID,Samajdar A.ORCID,Sanidas S. A.,Sardesai S. C.ORCID,Schmiedekamp A.ORCID,Schmiedekamp C.ORCID,Schmitz K.ORCID,Schult L.ORCID,Sesana A.,Shaifullah G.ORCID,Shannon R. M.ORCID,Shapiro-Albert B. J.ORCID,Siemens X.ORCID,Simon J.ORCID,Singha J.ORCID,Siwek M. S.ORCID,Speri L.ORCID,Spiewak R.ORCID,Srivastava A.ORCID,Stairs I. H.ORCID,Stappers B. W.,Stinebring D. R.ORCID,Stovall K.ORCID,Sun J. P.,Surnis M.ORCID,Susarla S. C.ORCID,Susobhanan A.ORCID,Swiggum J. K.ORCID,Takahashi K.ORCID,Tarafdar P.ORCID,Taylor J.,Taylor S. R.ORCID,Theureau G.ORCID,Thrane E.,Thyagarajan N.,Tiburzi C.,Toomey L.,Turner J. E.ORCID,Unal C.ORCID,Vallisneri M.ORCID,van der Wateren E.ORCID,van Haasteren R.ORCID,Vecchio A.ORCID,Venkatraman Krishnan V.ORCID,Verbiest J. P. W.ORCID,Vigeland S. J.ORCID,Wahl H. M.ORCID,Wang S.,Wang Q.,Witt C. A.ORCID,Wang J.ORCID,Wang L.,Wayt K. E.ORCID,Wu Z.ORCID,Young O.ORCID,Zhang L.,Zhang S.,Zhu X.-J.ORCID,Zic A.ORCID,

Abstract

Abstract The Australian, Chinese, European, Indian, and North American pulsar timing array (PTA) collaborations recently reported, at varying levels, evidence for the presence of a nanohertz gravitational-wave background (GWB). Given that each PTA made different choices in modeling their data, we perform a comparison of the GWB and individual pulsar noise parameters across the results reported from the PTAs that constitute the International Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA). We show that despite making different modeling choices, there is no significant difference in the GWB parameters that are measured by the different PTAs, agreeing within 1σ. The pulsar noise parameters are also consistent between different PTAs for the majority of the pulsars included in these analyses. We bridge the differences in modeling choices by adopting a standardized noise model for all pulsars and PTAs, finding that under this model there is a reduction in the tension in the pulsar noise parameters. As part of this reanalysis, we “extended” each PTA’s data set by adding extra pulsars that were not timed by that PTA. Under these extensions, we find better constraints on the GWB amplitude and a higher signal-to-noise ratio for the Hellings–Downs correlations. These extensions serve as a prelude to the benefits offered by a full combination of data across all pulsars in the IPTA, i.e., the IPTA’s Data Release 3, which will involve not just adding in additional pulsars but also including data from all three PTAs where any given pulsar is timed by more than a single PTA.

Funder

NSF ∣ Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences

EC ∣ European Research Council

UKRI ∣ Science and Technology Facilities Council

NSF ∣ MPS ∣ Division of Astronomical Sciences

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Research Corporation for Science Advancement

Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India

MOST ∣ National Natural Science Foundation of China

European Commission

Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

American Astronomical Society

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3