Affiliation:
1. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Care; Sechenov University
2. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Care
Abstract
Introduction. We present the clinical observation of a 72-year-old female patient with high surgical risk and structural degeneration of a bioprosthetic aortic valve (AV) cusps in the form of stenosis, accompanied by severe dysfunction. Transcatheter implantation of bioprosthesis Medtronic CoreValve™ Evolut™ R-23 was performed using the valve-in-valve technique. The choice of minimally invasive treatment tactics is substantiated, a preoperative examination algorithm and a specific bioprosthesis model for such intervention are provided. Materials and methods. Imaging – echocardiography (Echo), electrocardiography, multispiral computed tomography, coronary angiography. Bioprosthetic valve calcification and stenosis with critical parameters of the bioprosthetic AV peak pressure gradient according to Echo data were the indications for minimally invasive surgery. Results. Dynamic observation revealed a progressive deterioration in the function of the previously implanted bioprosthetic heart valve in the aortic position, and a critical deterioration in the patient’s condition. After additional examination of the patient and selection of a new prosthesis, valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement was done. The positive dynamics of the general state of the patient was noted in the early postoperative period. Echo data showed that the bioprosthetic AV peak systolic pressure gradient decreased from 90 to 29 mmHg, average gradient – from 42 to 19 mmHg. Conclusion. The minimally invasive valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement used to correct the dysfunction of a bioprosthetic AV that was previously implanted during an open surgery was shown to be safe and effective and can be considered as one of the options for repeat valve replacement.
Publisher
V.I. Shimakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Subject
Transplantation,Immunology and Allergy
Reference12 articles.
1. Klyshnikov RYu, Ovcharenko EA, Kudryavtseva YuA, Barbarash LS. «Valve-in-valve» reprosthesing of cardiac artificial valves. Russ J Cardiol. 2016; 11 (139): 73–80. [In Russ, English abstract]. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2016-11-73-80.
2. Imaev TE, Komlev AE, Kolegaev AS, Lepilin PM, Akchurin RS. The current status of transcatheter heart valve replacement, using the valve-in-valve technique. Consilium Medicum. 2016; 18 (5): 89–92. [In Russ, English abstract].
3. Nagaraja V, Raval J, Eslick GD, Denniss AR. Approaches for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Online J Health Allied Scs. 2013; 12 (4): 3.
4. Spaziano M, Mylotte D, Thériault-Lauzier P, Ole De Backer, Sndergaard L, Bosmans J et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus redo surgery for failing surgical aortic bioprostheses: a multicentre propensity score analysis . EuroIntervention. 2017; 13 (10): 1149–1156.
5. Hisato Takagi, Shohei Mitta, Tomo Ando. Meta-analysis of valve-in-valve transcatheter versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 67: 243–250.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献