Value of Extended Arrhythmia Screening in Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients

Author:

Koole Maarten Antonius1ORCID,de Jong Sanne2ORCID,Mulder Barbara J2ORCID,Bouma Berto Jorrit2ORCID,Schuuring Mark Johan3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cardiology Centres of the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; epartment of Cardiology, Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis, Beverwijk, the Netherlands

2. Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

3. 1. Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Circulatory Health, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands

Abstract

The European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease patients recommend screening for arrhythmias and bradycardias in symptomatic patients, often being done by means of an ambulatory 24–48-hour Holter or implantable loop recorder (ILR). However, nowadays non-invasive instruments, such as patches, smartwatches and smartphones based on single-lead ECGs that perform extended monitoring, are also available. The aim of this narrative review was to assess whether these instruments, when they detect arrhythmias and bradycardias in patients with adult congenital heart disease, will lead to meaningful changes in clinical care. Clinically meaningful changes include adjustment of medication, cardioversion, electrophysiology study, ablation or implantation of a cardiovascular implantable electronic device. The following monitoring instruments are discussed: cumulative Holter, 2-week continuous monitor, smartwatch- and smartphone-based single-lead ECG, and ILR. The diagnostic yield of extended rhythm monitoring is high, and varies between 18% (smartphone-based single-lead ECG) and 41% with ILR. In conclusion, contemporary arrhythmia screening includes various new non-invasive technologies that are promising new tools as an alternative to Holter monitoring or ILR. However, the optimal mode of detection is still unclear due to the lack of head-to-head comparisons.

Publisher

Radcliffe Media Media Ltd

Reference33 articles.

1. Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:e81–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1029; PMID: 30121239.

2. Baumgartner H, De Backer J, Babu-Narayan SV, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 2021;42:563–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa554; PMID: 32860028.

3. Bouma BJ, Mulder BJM. Changing landscape of congenital heart disease. Circ Res 2017;120:908–22. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309302; PMID: 28302739.

4. van der Velde ET, Vriend JW, Mannens MMAM, et al. CONCOR, an initiative towards a national registry and DNA-bank of patients with congenital heart disease in the Netherlands: rationale, design, and first results. Eur J Epidemiol 2005;20:549–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-4264-9; PMID: 16121765.

5. Koyak Z, Harris L, de Groot JR, et al. Sudden cardiac death in adult congenital heart disease. Circulation 2012;126:1944–54. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.104786; PMID: 22991410.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Tachyarrhythmias in congenital heart disease;Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine;2024-06-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3