Contemporary Review of Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critical Care Setting

Author:

Rali Aniket S1ORCID,Butcher Amy2ORCID,Tedford Ryan J3ORCID,Sinha Shashank S4,Mekki Pakinam5,Van Spall Harriette GC6ORCID,Sauer Andrew J7

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

2. Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Critical Care, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

4. Division of Cardiology, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA

5. Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

6. Department of Medicine, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

7. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

Abstract

Hemodynamic assessment remains the most valuable adjunct to physical examination and laboratory assessment in the diagnosis and management of shock. Through the years, multiple modalities to measure and trend hemodynamic indices have evolved with varying degrees of invasiveness. Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has long been considered the gold standard of hemodynamic assessment in critically ill patients and in recent years has been shown to improve clinical outcomes among patients in cardiogenic shock. The invasive nature of PAC is often cited as its major limitation and has encouraged development of less invasive technologies. In this review, the authors summarize the literature on the mechanism and validation of several minimally invasive and noninvasive modalities available in the contemporary intensive care unit. They also provide an update on the use of focused bedside echocardiography.

Publisher

Radcliffe Media Media Ltd

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3