Space Diplomacy and the Artemis Accords

Author:

Riordan Nancy1ORCID,Machoň Miloslav2ORCID,Csajková Lucia3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Doctoral candidate in Global Governance and Human Security, John W. McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies, University of Massachusetts https://dx.doi.org/14708 Boston, MA United States

2. Assistant Professor and Research Fellow, Department of International and Diplomatic Studies, Prague University of Economics and Business https://dx.doi.org/48205 Prague Czech Republic

3. Research Fellow, Department of International and Diplomatic Studies Department, Prague University of Economics and Business https://dx.doi.org/48205 Prague Czech Republic

Abstract

Summary The growth of human activity in outer space is attracting more International Relations (IR) scholar’s attention, enabling an understanding of the involvement of specific groups of actors and the dynamics of political negotiations that lead to concluding agreements on using outer space for peaceful purposes. This article provides analysis based on the triangulation of qualitative data gathered via document analysis and in-depth semi-structured expert interviews to gain insight into the involvement of the actors responsible for the negotiations that led to the Artemis Accords and their diplomatic communication style. The results identified different uses of public and private diplomatic communication for advancing norms of behaviour and transparency. Negotiators used public diplomatic communication in order to influence foreign governments on the need for norms of behaviour and transparency to further peaceful space exploration beyond low Earth orbit. Private diplomatic communication facilitated the inclusion of commercial partners.

Publisher

Brill

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference83 articles.

1. The Moon Village and Space 4.0: The “Open Concept” as a New Way of Doing Space?;Athanasopoulos, Harald K.

2. Public Diplomacy Evaluation;Banks, Robert

3. The Theory-Generating Expert Interview: Epistemological Interest, Forms of Knowledge, Interaction;Bogner, Alexander

4. Developing Planetary Sustainability: Legal Challenges of Space 4.0;Bohlmann, Ulrike M.

5. International Trust and Public Opinion about World Affairs;Brewer, Paul. R.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3