Affiliation:
1. University of South Africa South Africa Pretoria
Abstract
Abstract
This article contains a critical reflection of the neuroscientific research of Benjamin Libet which claims that free will does not exist and that it is your brain and not you that takes decisions. The Libetian style research on free will is characterised by a conceptual reduction of free will, a perpetuation of dualistic thinking and the ontological emaciation of free will as a mechanistic action instead of as a complex process. The underlying philosophical and metaphysical assumptions of Libetian research is critically analysed with the verdict that it is not about free will and that it does not in any way addresses the complex nature of free will in humans. Viewed against an alternative neuroscientific perspective on free will, three astonishing features of these studies are highlighted in conclusion.
Subject
Religious studies,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference60 articles.
1. Aftab, Macksood. “Is Islam Committed to Dualism in the Context of the Problem of Free Will?” Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics 3, no. 1 (2015): 1–12. http://jcn.cognethic.org/jcnv3i1_Aftab.pdf.
2. Banks, William P., and Eve A. Isham. “Do We Really Know What We Are Doing? Implications of Reported Time of Decision for Theories of Volition.” Pages 47–60 in Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet. Edited by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Lynn Nadel. Oxford Series on Neuroscience, Law & Philosophy. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195381641.003.0006.
3. Bartra, Roger. Anthropology of the Brain: Consciousness, Culture, and Free Will. Translated by Gusti Gould. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
4. Bennett, M.R., and P.M.S. Hacker. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ; Chichester: John Wiley, 2022.
5. Berniȗnas, Renatas, Audrius Beinorius, Vilius Dranseika, Vytis Silius, and Paulius Rimkevičius. “The Weirdness of Belief in Free Will.” Consciousness and Cognition 87 (2021), art. 103054: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONCOG.2020.103054.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献