Moral Objectivism in Cross-Cultural Perspective

Author:

Beebe James1,Qiaoan Runya2,Wysocki Tomasz3,Endara Miguel A.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Philosophy, State University of New York at BuffaloUSA131 Park Hall, Buffalo, ny 14260-4150

2. Sun Yat-sen UniversityP.R. ChinaKanton

3. Department of Philosophy, Washington University in St. LouisUSAOne Brookings Drive, St. Louis, mo 63130-4899

4. Azusa Pacific Online UniversityUSA901 E. Alosta Avenue, Azusa, ca 91702-7000

Abstract

Moral psychologists have recently turned their attention to the study of folk metaethical beliefs. We report the results of a cross-cultural study using Chinese, Polish and Ecuadorian participants that seeks to advance this line of investigation. Individuals in all three demographic groups were observed to attribute objectivity to ethical statements in very similar patterns. Differences in participants’ strength of opinion about an issue, the level of societal agreement or disagreement about an issue, and participants’ age were found to significantly affect their inclination to view the truth of an ethical statement as a matter of objective fact. Implications for theorizing about folk morality are discussed.

Publisher

Brill

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology

Reference20 articles.

1. How different kinds of disagreement impact folk metaethical judgments.;Beebe,2014

2. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics

3. Can folk aesthetics ground aesthetic realism?;Cova;The Monist,2012

Cited by 37 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Need for Measure Calibration in Experimental Philosophy;Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy;2024-08-01

2. The Impact of Ritual Participation on Perceived Moral Objectivity: A Longitudinal Investigation of the U.S. Adolescents;Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion;2024-05-06

3. Moral dumbfounding and imaginative resistance;Philosophical Psychology;2024-01-10

4. ¿Moralidad sin competencia? Dos interpretaciones de la objeción de inmoralidad al pirronismo;Ideas y Valores;2023-09-07

5. The Psychology of Metaethics;Experiments in Moral and Political Philosophy;2023-07-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3