Affiliation:
1. Salzburg University Austria Salzburg
Abstract
AbstractThe present article reconstructs the evolution of the Manichaean exegesis of Genesis 1:26 based on the texts that circulated within the Roman Empire. Mani’sEpistula Fundamenti, Adimantus’Disputationes,Kephalaia of the Teacher, Faustus’Capitula24, as well as polemical works of Christian authors provide ample evidence of the Manichaean use and interpretation of the biblical narrative. Two complementary exegetical traditions can be distinguished: the first one, going back to Mani himself, introduces vetero-testamentary elements in the Manichaean doctrine without directly referencing or criticizing the Jewish Scriptures, while the second tradition that directly engages in the exegesis of the Jewish Scriptures text emerged through polemics with Christians and is likely to originate from Adimantus. The study illustrates a dual role of the Book of Genesis in Manichaeism: as one of the sources of the Manichaean mythology and as a central point of contention in Christian-Manichaean polemics.
Subject
Religious studies,History
Reference109 articles.
1. Alfaric, Prosper. 1919. Les Écritures manichéennes: Études analytiques. Paris: Emile Nourry.
2. Attridge, Harold. 1980. “The Philosophical critique of Religion under the Early Empire.” Pages 45–77 in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 16:2. Edited by Wolfgang Haase. Berlin: De Gruyter.
3. Baker-Brian, Nicolas. 2009. Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire: A Study of Augustine’s Contra Adimantum. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
4. Baker-Brian, Nicolas. 2011. Manichaeism: An Ancient Faith Rediscovered. London: T&T Clarc.
5. Barc, Bernard. 1975. “La taille cosmique d’Adam dans la littérature juive rabbinique des trois premiers siècles après J.-C.” Revue des Sciences Religieuses 49: 173–185.