Climate-related financial risks as a governance challenge: An inclusive international public policy proposal

Author:

von Borowski Dodl Alessandra1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Central Bank of Brazil

Abstract

This study focuses on climate-related financial risks as a governance issue, which drives our attention to the quality of stakeholders’ interactions. The theoretical approach is undertaken through the institutional literature lens, along with the works of Rawls (1971, 2001) and Sen (1992, 2000, 2009), and contributions from the conceptions of co-creation and inclusive development. The applied analysis is carried out by connecting climate change to financial risks under a scenario of uncertainty (Bolton, Despres, Pereira da Silva, Samama, & Svartzman, 2020; TCFD, 2017; Daniel, Litterman, & Wagner, 2019; Carney, 2016; Maier et al., 2016; NGFS, 2018, 2019). The core objective of this study is to present a public policy proposal that aims to support effective international climate-related agreements, from a procedural perspective. To this end, we start by presenting an institution, which is broken down into three propositions. This process enables us to undertake a critical analysis from a technical and normative standpoint. The latter is based on Bush (1987). The main contribution of this study is the rationale underlying that the best set of policies to face climate change issues is that representing agents’ strong engagement and commitment. Finally, although the applied analysis focuses on climate change issues, the discussion conducted here can be reproduced in other areas.

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Subject

Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Reference53 articles.

1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2004). Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth (NBER Working Paper No. 10481). https://doi.org/10.3386/w10481

2. Andersen, A. D., & Andersen, P. D. (2016). Foresighting for inclusive development (TIK Working Paper on Innovation Studies No. 20160115). Retrieved from https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/foresighting-for-inclusive-development-2

3. Baker McKenzie. (2020). A guide to regulatory fintech sandboxes internationally. Retrieved from https://www.bakermckenzie.com/-/media/files/insight/publications/2020/05/a_guide_to_regulatory_fintech_sandboxes_internationally_8734.pdf?la=en

4. Bank for International Settlements (BIS). (2021). CBDCs: An opportunity for the monetary system (BIS Annual Economic Report). Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2021e3.pdf

5. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2019). Report on open banking and application programming interfaces. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d486.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3