Affiliation:
1. University of South Africa
Abstract
The study examines how risk governance mechanisms affect the risk activities of banks in emerging markets, Africa in particular. The sample comprised of forty-one banks in twelve African economies. Consistent with Akbar, Kharabsheh, Poletti-Hughes, and Shah (2017), Battaglia and Gallo (2017), and Sila, Gonzalez, and Hagendorff (2016), system GMM which controls for reverse causality and endogeneity was used for analysis. Surprisingly, the study found that the presence of a standalone risk committee, training in risk management and/or related courses, and the appointment of the chief risk officer (CRO) to the board increases instead of decreasing bank risk. Qualifications and experience in risk management or finance and the establishment of a CRO position were found to have an insignificant impact on risk outcomes. Intuitively, the study found that the appointment of females on bank boards results in risk-averse decisions and thus supports current calls for female representation on boards. A key takeaway from this paper is that establishing effective risk governance systems in emerging markets creates incentives for banks to take more risk, possibly, due to the fact that governance mechanisms that align the interests of managers and shareholders lead to higher bank risk (Felício, Rodrigues, Grove, & Greiner, 2018). This counterintuitive behavior calls for the design of appropriate governance and regulatory mechanisms that curtail bank risk in the African context.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management
Reference92 articles.
1. Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Science, 58(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452
2. Aebi, V., Sabato, G., & Schmid, M. (2012). Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3213–3226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.020
3. Akbar, S., Kharabsheh, B., Poletti-Hughes, J., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2017). Board structure and corporate risk taking in the UK financial sector. International Review of Financial Analysis, 50, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.02.001
4. Aleemi, A. R., Uddin, I., & Kashif, M. (2019). Competition and risk-taking behavior of banks: New evidence from market power and capital requirements. Pakistan Business Review, 21(3), 540–559. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343255508_COMPETITION_AND_RISK_TAKING_BEHAVIOR_OF_BANKS_NEW_EVIDENCE_FROM_MARKET_POWER_AND_CAPITAL_REQUIREMENTS
5. Aljughaiman, A. A., & Salama, A. (2019). Do banks effectively manage their risks? The role of risk governance in the MENA region. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38(5), 106680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.106680
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献