Green Building Policy Options for the Public Sector

Author:

Pearce Annie R1,DuBose Jennifer R2,Bosch Sheila J3

Affiliation:

1. Myers-Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.

2. Sustainable Facilities & Infrastructure Program, Georgia Tech Research Institute, Atlanta, GA 30332-0837.

3. College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.

Abstract

Green building is receiving increased attention in the public sector in the United States. Over the past ten years, public sector organizations have gone from “testing the waters” with green building pilot projects to developing wide-reaching policies that incorporate green building practices and standards as a formal part of capital project decision processes. A variety of approaches have been employed at the federal, state, and local levels that encourage or require green building practices on public sector projects. To date, however, there has been no systematic evaluation of the pros and cons of these policy options to provide a basis for organizations considering how best to construct a program to meet the needs of its specific context. This paper identifies, compares, and contrasts options that have been incorporated as part of green building programs for states and other public sector organization seeking to motivate green building practices in their capital projects and facilities. Three categories of options are considered: Policy, Program, and Evaluation options. The paper evaluates alternatives within each of these categories according to their potential social, environmental, and economic impacts as well as their likelihood of implementation success within the context of public agencies. The findings of this paper contribute a palette of options for policymakers to consider when drafting policies for their organizations, along with program options to be considered by those who must implement the policies. This work contributes a foundation for future research to further understand the relative effectiveness and impacts of policy elements on green building practice within public sector organizations.

Publisher

College Publishing

Subject

General Environmental Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Civil and Structural Engineering,Building and Construction,Architecture,Environmental Engineering,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference39 articles.

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How does population aging affect green building development?:a study from China evidence;Environment, Development and Sustainability;2024-06-20

2. Benefits and challenges of implementing green building development in Nigeria;Built Environment Project and Asset Management;2024-01-02

3. Policy Tools for Accelerating Sustainable Development Goals in Building Development;Implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals – Regional Perspectives;2024

4. Fuzzy inference decision model to quantify the effectiveness of incentives on delivering green buildings;International Journal of Construction Management;2023-11-16

5. Policy Tools for Accelerating Sustainable Development Goals in Building Development;SDGs in Africa and the Middle East Region;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3