Paradigmatic dimensions of local public management research: The path to reliable managerial decisions

Author:

Tretiak Oleksii Anatoliiovych1ORCID,Khmelnykov Artem Oleksandrovych2ORCID,Batrymenko Oleh Volodymyrovych3ORCID,Karashchuk Мykola4ORCID,Husieva Nataliia5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro Ukraine.

2. University of Customs and Finance of Ukraine (Dnipro, Ukraine).

3. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Kyiv, Ukraine).

4. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

5. State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Abstract

Explicated the need to compare the established paradigmatic ideas in local public management and in the political science research environment. Particular attention is paid to the important issue of the project relationship establishing between the paradigmatic approach and the subject field of public management research. Essential discrepancies between the key paradigmatic approaches to local public management and policy making at the local level are revealed. Stated the necessity of essential empirical material evaluation for further research and possibly improvement of the regulatory framework for local public management. Proved that the particular author's (actors`) main reason for conducting paradigmatic discussions on local public management is the need to communicate with a powerful research tradition. It is concluded that, the success of public policies and their impact on the lives of citizens depends on an understanding of epistemic foundations. Established that different paradigmatic alternatives of public decisions are determined on the basis of scientific data. Considered the most optimal way of applying any paradigmatic approaches is the analysis of the expediency of applying the methodology and forecasting the achievement of scientific novelty or specific results of management projects.

Publisher

Amazonia Investiga

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3