Abstract
Schmitt makes a distinction between politics and the political; however, he does not speak about the distinction between morality and the moral. By introducing the concept of the moral, we aim to show the weak points of his critique of liberalism. The aim of the article is to look at Schmitt’s concept of the political from the perspective of the moral. This helps to reveal previously unseen aspects of his theory. First, the ontology of the moral stands in direct competition with the ontology of the political. Secondly, the political is not a separate ontology because it depends on the primacy of anthropological presuppositions. Thirdly, Schmitt’s concept of the political is paradoxically like the liberal stance of morality, which is the object of his critique.
Subject
Philosophy,General Materials Science
Reference20 articles.
1. Berkowitz, P., 1999. Virtue and the Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton University Press.
2. Bielefeldt, H., 1997. Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Systematic Reconstruction and Countercriticism. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 1: 65-75.
3. Dworkin, R., 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
4. Freund, J., 1995. Schmitt's Political Thought. Telos 102: 11-42.
5. Förster, E., 2012. The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy, trans. B. Bowman. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献