Dialectality Measurement: A Research Model for Discussion

Author:

Kardelis VytautasORCID

Abstract

The aim of this article is to propose a model for studying linguistic behavior and dialectality measurement for scientific discussion. To achieve the goal, the following tasks are set: 1) to briefly review and evaluate the previous studies on linguistic attitudes and linguistic behavior, 2) to systematize the methods of data collection and data analysis, 3) to develop a model for studying linguistic behavior and to present dialectality measurement for discussion. The proposed model for studying linguistic behavior and dialectality measurement has been partially verified through an exploratory study, but the results of this study will be discussed in another publication. Now the focus is only on methodological questions. The research model consists of two parts. The first is data collection the second is data analysis. The data collection part consists of two components: 1) selection of informants and 2) formation of a corpus of empirical material. The empirical material corpus formation component consists of five partly independent, partly interrelated points: 1) A questionnaire at the beginning of data collection, 2) Creative tasks, 3) Free conversation, 4) Detailed interview, 5) A questionnaire at the end of data collection. The data analysis part consists of three components: 1) Technical preparation of the recordings (texts) obtained during the creative task, free conversation and detailed interview, 2) Speech analysis, carried out after applying the distribution tables method, and 3) Dialectally measurement and calculating linguistic distance.

Publisher

Vilnius University Press

Reference35 articles.

1. Aliūkaitė, Daiva. 2019. Objektyvusis tarmiškumas: požymiai ir vertė. Respectus Philologicus. Vol. 35 (40). 63-91. Prieiga internetu: https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/respectus-philologicus/article/view/12717

2. Aliūkaitė, Daiva, Danguolė Mikulėnienė, Agnė Čepaitienė, Laura Geržotaitė. 2017. Kalbos variantiškumas ir jo vertinimas perceptyviosios dialektologijos požiūriu: variantų ir vietų vaizdiniai. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.

3. Aliūkaitė, Daiva, Danguolė Mikulėnienė, Agnė Čepaitienė, Laura Brazaitienė. 2020. Lietuvių kalbos variantai: tyrėjo ir paprastojo kalbos bendruomenės nario perspektyvos. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.

4. Bacevičiūtė, Rima, Audra Ivanauskienė, Asta Leskauskaitė, Edmundas Trumpa, sud. 2004. Lietuvių kalbos tarmių chrestomatija. Laima Grumadienė, red. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas.

5. Brinker, Klaus, Sven F. Sager. 2006. Linguistische Gesprächsanalyse. Eine Einführung. 4., neu bearbeitete Auflage. Berlin: Schmidt.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3