Abstract
This paper looks at how the ontological and epistemological premises of posthumanism allow educators to reread a curriculum. Document analysis reveals the current grade 6 first foreign language curriculum in Lithuania as being, in Deleuzian terms, a striated, exhaustive, and positivist one. It is also ridden with tension to meet both the naturally arising learners’ interests and standardized learning outcomes. Posthumanism, which invites educators to look at the curriculum rhizomatically, allows for different kind of learning – defined through thinking, becoming, and affirming.
Reference34 articles.
1. Bilbokaitė, R. (2022). Mokykla paruošia egzaminams ar gyvenimui? Mokslas be pamokslų. Retrieved October 8, 2022, from Mokslas be pamokslų. Mokykla paruošia egzaminams ar gyvenimui? - LRT
2. Boden, L.; Gunnarsson, K. (2021). Nothing, Anything, and Everything: Conversations on Postqualitative Methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 192-197. Retrieved October 5, 2022, from: Nothing, Anything, and Everything: Conversations on Postqualitative Methodology - Linnea Bodén, Karin Gunnarsson, 2021 (sagepub.com)
3. Bogue, R. (2007). Search, Swim and See: Deleuze's Apprenticeship in Signs and Pedagogy of Images. In Semetsky, I. (Ed.). Nomadic Education. Variations on a Theme by Deleuze and Guattari (pp. 1-16). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
4. Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman Affirmative Politics. In Wilmer, S. E.& Žukauskaitė, A., (Eds.). Resisting Biopolitics: Philosophical, Political and Performative Strategies (30-56). New York: Routledge.
5. Braidotti, R. (2017a). Critical Posthuman Knowledges. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 116(1), 83-96.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献