Test of a full-scale two-story steel X-BRBF: Strong-axis instability of buckling restrained brace associated with out-of-plane bending of gusset connections
-
Published:2023-11
Issue:
Volume:
Page:232-236
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:Proceedings of the International Conference - Celebrating 60 Years of IBST
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Proceedings of the International Conference - 60 Years of IBST
Affiliation:
1. HaNoi University of Civil Engineering
Abstract
This paper presents tests and finite element analyses of a two-story, buckling-restrained braced frame (BRBF) with X-bracing configuration, called X-BRBF. The BRB used in this work is composed of a core plate sandwiched by a pair of the restraining member with bolts, called a sandwiched buckling restrained brace (SBRB). The weak-axis of the SBRB core that had a rectangular plate was positioned transverse to the dual-gusset plate connection and in-plane movement of the frame. The objectives of the frame test were to evaluate: (1) the seismic performance of SBRBs with a small width-to-thickness ratio of the core plate (i.e. 3), (2) the effects of free-edge stiffeners on the gusset and BRB stability, and (3) the BRB stability associated with the lateral torsional buckling (LTB) of the beam. The two-story X-BRBF subassembly had two test phases: all gusset connections had free-edge stiffeners in Phase 1 test, and freeedge stiffeners were removed from half of gusset connections in Phase 2 test. The X-BRBF in Phase 1 test exhibited good performance up to a second-floor drift of 1.6%, but in Phase 2 test the second-floor SBRB caused by LTB of the beam showed asymmetric instability about its strong-axis of the core plate at 1.6% second-floor drift. The other SBRB with no LTB of the beam showed one-side instability about its strongaxis at 2% second-floor drift (about 2.5% interstory drift). However, the strength degradation of the X-BRBF subassembly was not observed in the strong-axis instability of SBRBs, indicating an acceptable orientation of BRBs for eliminating a typical weak-axis buckling of BRBs together with out-of-plane bending of gusset plates. The strong-axis instability of SBRBs could be evaluated by using the BRB stability concept together with the measured out-of-plane deformation of gusset plates in Phase 2 test.
Publisher
Vietnam Institute for Building Science and Technology
Subject
Ocean Engineering,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science,General Medicine,Development,Geography, Planning and Development,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science,Materials Chemistry
Reference8 articles.
1. [1] Chou, C. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2010). Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces. Engineering Structures, 32(8), 21082121. 2. [2] Chou, C. C., Liu, J. H., Pham D. H. (2012). “Steel Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames with Single and Dual Corner Gusset Connections: Seismic Tests and Analyses”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 7(41): 1137-1156. 3. [3] Chou, C. C., Chung, P. T., Cheng, Y. T. (2016). “Experimental Evaluation of LargeScale Dual-Core Self-Centering Braces and Sandwiched Buckling-Restrained Braces”. Engineering Structures, 116, 12-25. 4. [4] Chou, C. C., Hsiao, C. H., Chen, Z. B., Chung, P. T., Pham, D. H. (2018). Seismic Tests of Full-Scale Two-Story Steel Frames with SelfCentering Braces and Buckling-Restrained Braces. the 11th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, EERI, Los Angeles, USA. 5. [5] Chou, C. C., Hsiao, C. H, Chen, Z. B, Chung, P. T, Pham, D. H. (2019). “Seismic loading tests of full-scale two-story steel building frames with self-centering braces and bucklingrestrained braces. Thin-Walled Structures, 140, 168-181.
|
|