Feedlot cattle diets based on barley or corn supplemented with dry corn gluten feed evaluated using the NRC and CNCPS beef models

Abstract

A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of supplementing feedlot finishing corn diets with dry corn gluten feed (CGF). Animal performance and carcass traits were compared with those obtained by feeding a barley-based diet typical of diets fed commercially in western Canadian feedlots. The second objective of the experiment was to evaluate the diets using the 1996 National Research Council (NRC) Beef (level 1 and 2) and Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS, version 5.0) models to determine how well the models predict animal response. Crossbred beef steers (248) weighing 423 ± 20.5 kg were allocated to 24 pens and then six pens were assigned to each of four diets: (1) barley grain (13.8% crude protein, CP), (2) corn grain (9.2% CP), (3) corn grain supplemented with a low level (7%, DM basis) of CGF (CGF-low, 9.7% CP), and (4) corn grain supplemented with a high level (23%) of CGF (CGF-high, 11.7% CP). The barley grain was steam-rolled and the corn grain was dry-rolled. All diets contained 8% barley silage (DM basis). The cattle were adapted from a backgrounding diet to the experimental diets over a period of 28 d and then fed for a period of 136 d. During the adaptation phase cattle fed unsupplemented corn grew slower (P < 0.05) than the cattle fed the other diets (1.23 vs. 1.52 kg d-1). However, after day 42 of the study, cattle fed unsupplemented corn grew very rapidly such that gain for the entire feeding period was similar for cattle fed unsupplemented corn and barley diets (1.62 vs. 1.58, P > 0.05). Furthermore, growth rate was higher (P < 0.05) for cattle fed barley or unsupplemented corn than for cattle fed low or high levels of CGF (1.48 and 1.45 kg d-1, respectively). The dry matter intake (DMI) averaged 11.4 kg d-1 during the feeding period and was not affected (P > 0.05) by diet. Feed:gain ratio (kg DM:kg gain) was similar (P > 0.05) for cattle fed barley (7.09) and unsupplemented corn (7.38), but was higher (P < 0.05) for cattle fed CGF-high (7.92), and intermediate (P > 0.05) for those fed CGF-low (7.52). There were no differences in carcass composition between barley and corn-fed cattle, but those fed low and high levels of CGF had carcasses that were fatter with lower lean meat yield. The three models underestimated DMI of all four diets. When DMI was set to observed intake in the models, CNCPS accurately predicted ADG and F:G ratio for cattle fed corn diets, but all models underestimated ADG of cattle fed barley. All models correctly predicted that gain during the feeding period was not limited by protein supply. The results from this study indicate that rolled-corn diets containing about 9.5% CP, with 50% of the CP as DIP are adequate for feedlot cattle weighing more that 500 kg. Substituting dry CGF for corn grain reduces feed efficiency and gain due to the lower digestible energy content of CGF. Key words: Grain, barley, corn, corn gluten feed, feedlot cattle, protein, models