The effects of spring versus summer calving on beef cattle reproductive and growth performance in western Canada

Author:

Durunna Obioha N.1,Girardin Lynne C.2,Scott Shannon L.3,Robins Clayton4,Block Hushton C.5,Iwaasa Alan D.6,Khakbazan Mohammad1,Lardner Herbert A.7

Affiliation:

1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada R7A 5Y3

2. 103-610 Stensrud Road, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7W 0E5

3. Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6X 0B3

4. Box 83 Rivers, Manitoba, Canada R0K 1X0

5. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe Research Centre, 6000 C&E Trail, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada T4L 1W1

6. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Swift Current, Saskatchewan, Canada S9H 3X2

7. Western Beef Development Centre, Humboldt, Saskatchewan, Canada S0K 2A0

Abstract

Durunna, O. N., Girardin, L. C., Scott, S. L., Robins, C., Block, H. C., Iwaasa, A. D., Khakbazan, M. and Lardner, H. A. 2014. The effects of spring versus summer calving on beef cattle reproductive and growth performance in western Canada. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 94: 259–271. The majority of beef producers in western Canada have adopted a spring calving system. Evaluating alternative calving systems such as summer calving may lead to better use of forage resources to optimize cow-calf productivity. In order to evaluate the impact of calving system on cow-calf productivity, 346 Hereford or Angus crossbred cows were used in a 3-yr research study (2007 to 2009) at Brandon, Manitoba; Swift Current, Saskatchewan and Lanigan, Saskatchewan. Cows were bred to calve from February to May (early-calving system, EC) or from May to August (late-calving system, LC). Each system was evaluated for effect on performance and reproductive efficiency. Forage yield, utilization and nutritive value were assessed. Cow body weights (BW), ultrasound measures of backfat and calf BW were evaluated at precalving, breeding and weaning. There was no difference between calving systems for pregnancy rate (P=0.13) EC (93.0%) vs. LC (95.8%); calving rate (P=0.89) EC (92.0%) vs. LC (91.7%) or proportion of calves born alive (P=0.85) EC (99.5%) vs. LC (99.6%). The average length of calving season was not different (P=0.26) between the two systems. The EC cows had greater (P=0.002) BW losses from calving to breeding but greater (P=0.001) BW gain from breeding to weaning than LC cows. Although calves born in LC had greater birth BW (P=0.003) than EC calves, calf weaning rate (P=0.01) and calf weaning BW (P<0.0001) were greater in EC. The higher weaning rate and higher weaning BW with EC has the potential to increase cow-calf productivity and may be more attractive to beef producers in western Canada.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology,Food Animals

Reference31 articles.

1. Extended Grazing Systems for Improving Economic Returns from Nebraska Sandhills Cow/calf Operations

2. Adams, D., Clark, D., Sandberg, R., Carriker, G., Klopfenstein, T. and Milton, T. 2001. June vs. March calving for the Nebraska Sandhills: Production traits. Pages 8–9 in Nebraska Beef Report. Agric. Res. Div., Univ. of Nebraska Coop. Ext., Inst. Agric. Nat. Res. Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.

3. Adams, R. S. 1995. Dairy nutrition. Pages 108–109 in C. Walker, ed. Dairy reference manual. 3rd ed. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service. Ithaca, NY.

4. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2005. Official method 942.05 Ash in animal feed. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. AOAC, Arlington VA.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3