Abstract
You and Your Babywas a pregnancy advice booklet, produced by the British Medical Association (BMA) from 1957–1987. This booklet was provided to expectant mothers in the UK, free of charge, and offered authoritative information on pregnancy, childbirth and caring for infants. Reprinted each year,You and Your Babycaptured contemporary maternity policy and advice. But, in addition to the typical information that you might expect about mother and baby health,You and Your Babyadvised readers on matters such as maintaining their appearance, marital relations and domestic duties. In this way, it advocated a specific vision of motherhood, with responsibilities to the home and husband. Further to these duties, this article will focus on the balance of responsibilities between pregnant women and their doctors, and how attitudes to trust and authority developed over time. The BMA publication repeatedly warned readers against listening to ‘old wives’ tales’, instead emphasising the importance of accepting (and not questioning) professional medical guidance. Following the thalidomide scandal, however, women were made partially responsible for doctors' professional integrity; women were advised to avoid asking their doctors to prescribe medication that may later prove to be harmful, shifting the responsibility from the healthcare practitioner to the mother. This created an uncomfortable dissonance between the publication’s attempts to establish and reinforce medical authority, and yet shift professional responsibility. The booklet series, therefore, posed women as responsible for their doctors, as well as their babies. In summary, this article presents a case study of theYou and Your BabyBMA booklet, examining developing healthcare messaging around maternal behaviour and responsibility. It draws attention to supposed responsibilities to the home, husband and doctor and how those responsibilities changed over 30 years.
Reference80 articles.
1. Al-Gailani S . 2013. “Pregnancy, Pathology and Public Morals: Making Antenatal Care in Edinburgh Around 1900.” In Western Maternity and Medicine 1880-1990. Routledge.
2. Al-Gailani S . 2018. “Hospital Birth.” In Reproduction: Antiquity to the Present Day, edited by Lauren K. , Nick H. , and Rebecca F. , 553–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781107705647
3. “‘The Mothers of England Object’: Public Health, Privacy and Professional Ethics in the Early Twentieth-Century Debate over the Notification of Pregnancy.”;Al-Gailani;Social History of Medicine,2020
4. “Introduction to ‘Transforming Pregnancy since 1900.’”;Al-Gailani;Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences,2014
5. Apple R . 1988. Mothers and Medicine: Social History of Infant Feeding, 1890-1950. 1st ed. Madison: Wis: University of Wisconsin Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Making Modern Maternity;Medical Humanities;2024-06