Abstract
Persson and Savulescu argue that moral bioenhancement is not only morally permissible; in some cases, it is morally obligatory. In this article, I introduce a new reason to worry about moral enhancement. I adapt the disability concept ofmisfitto show how moral enhancement could cause extrememoral disempowermentto those enhanced, which would result in moral injury. I argue that any safety framework that guides the development of moral bioenhancement must be sensitive to the problem of moral misfitting. I present the best case for moral bioenhancement before turning to my own worry concerning the development of moral bioenhancement and its practical implications. Finally, I consider a series of objections and responses.
Subject
Philosophy,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference68 articles.
1. Andrew L. B . 2022. Physician Suicide. Medscape.
2. Utilitarianism, Integrity, and Partiality
3. Avery S . 2022. Indications of Moral Injury Similar between Combat Veterans and COVID-19 Health Care Workers. Duke Health.
4. Bartlett R . 2000. England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings, 1075-1225, The New Oxford History of England. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5. Brown W . 2011. Violence in Medieval Europe. London: Pearson.