Individual and geospatial factors associated with receipt of colorectal cancer screening: a state-wide mixed-level analysis

Author:

Bayly Jennifer EORCID,Schonberg Mara A,Castro Marcia C,Mukamal Kenneth J

Abstract

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in US adults but can be reduced by screening. The roles of individual and contextual factors, and especially physician supply, in attaining universal CRC screening remains uncertain.MethodsWe used data from adults 50–75 years old participating in the 2018 New York (NY) Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System linked to county-level covariates, including primary care physician (PCP) density and gastroenterologist (GI) density. Data were analysed in 2023–2024. Our analyses included (1) ecological and geospatial analyses of county-level CRC screening prevalence and (2) individual-level Poisson regression models of receipt of screening, adjusted for socioeconomic and county-level contextual variables.ResultsMean prevalence of up-to-date CRC screening was 71% (95% CI 70% to 73%) across NY’s 62 counties. County-level CRC screening demonstrated significant spatial patterning (Global Moran’s I=0.14, p=0.04), consistent with the existence of county-level contextual factors. In both county-level and individual-level analyses, lack of health insurance was associated with lower likelihood of up-to-date screening (ß=−1.09 (95% CI −2.00 to –0.19); adjusted prevalence ratio 0.68 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.77)), even accounting for age, race/ethnicity and education. In contrast, county-level densities of both PCPs and GIs were completely unassociated with screening at either the county or individual level. As expected, other determinants at the individual level included education status and age.ConclusionIn this state-wide representative analysis, physician density was completely unassociated with CRC screening, although health insurance status remains strongly related. In similar screening environments, broadened insurance coverage for CRC screening is likely to improve screening far more effectively than increased physician supply.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Health Resources and Services Administration

Publisher

BMJ

Reference35 articles.

1. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group . U.S cancer statistics data visualizations tool, based on 2021 submission data (1999-2019): U.S. Department of health and human services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dataviz [Accessed 11 Nov 2022].

2. Screening for Colorectal Cancer

3. Public health impact of achieving 80% colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States by 2018

4. Screening for Colorectal Cancer

5. Screening for Colorectal Cancer

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3