Evaluation of a blended care programme for caregivers and working pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes: an intervention study

Author:

van Beukering MoniqueORCID,Velu Adeline,Schonewille Lydia Henrike Nicole,Duijnhoven Ruben,Mol Ben Willem,Brand Teus,Frings-Dresen Monique,Kok Marjolein

Abstract

ObjectiveWork-related activities can be a risk factor for pregnancy complications such as preterm birth. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a blended care programme, Pregnancy and Work, that provides pregnant workers and their obstetrical caregivers with advice on work adjustment.MethodsWomen less than 20 weeks of gestation, in paid employment or self-employed, in the care of four participating hospitals and their referring midwifery practices in the Netherlands received either the blended care programme (n=119), consisting of a training for professionals and a mobile health application, or care as usual (n=122) in a controlled intervention study with a follow-up in intervention and control populations. All participants completed three questionnaires concerning health and working conditions at 16, 24 and 32 weeks of pregnancy. Primary outcome was the percentage of women who received advice from their obstetrical caregiver about work adjustment. Secondary outcomes were work status, realised work adjustment and working conditions. Groups were compared using univariate and multivariate regression analyses.ResultsA total of 188 (78%) completed all three questionnaires. In the blended care group, women received more advice from obstetrical caregivers to adjust their work than in the control group, 41 (39%) vs 21 (18%) (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 2.2, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.4), but less from their employer 8 (8%) vs 31 (28%) (aRR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.61). There were no significant differences in realised work adjustments. At 24 weeks, 30% of the pregnant women in both groups continued to work in hazardous workplaces.ConclusionAmong working pregnant women, the blended care intervention increases advice on work adjustment given by midwives and obstetricians, but does not lead to more work adjustments.

Funder

ZonMw

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference39 articles.

1. Gao G , Livingston G . Working while pregnant is much more common than it used to be. Pew research center. Available: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/03/31/working-while-pregnant-is-much-more-common-than-it-used-to-be/

2. Perez SA , van den Brakel W . Portegijs (SCP) (2018). summary Emancipation monitor 2018. economic position of women improved. in: Emancipatiemonitor, 2018. Available: https://www.scp.nl/english/Publications/Summaries_by_year/Summaries_2018/Emancipation_Monitor_2018

3. The impact of occupational activities during pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis

4. The impact of occupational shift work and working hours during pregnancy on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

5. Physically demanding work and preterm delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3