Systematic review and meta-analysis of text messaging interventions to support tobacco cessation

Author:

Puljević ChenealORCID,Meciar Isabel,Holland Alice,Stjepanović DanielORCID,Snoswell Centaine LORCID,Thomas Emma E,Morphett KylieORCID,Kang Heewon,Chan Gary,Grobler Etienne,Gartner Coral EORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of text message-based interventions for smoking cessation, including the effects of dose (number of text messages) and concomitant use of behavioural or pharmacological interventions.Data sourcesWe searched seven databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science), Google Scholar and the reference lists of relevant publications for RCTs. Eligible studies included participants aged ≥15 years who smoked tobacco at enrolment.Study selectionOne reviewer screened titles and abstracts and two reviewers independently screened full texts of articles.Data extractionOne of three reviewers independently extracted data on study and intervention characteristics and smoking abstinence rates using Qualtrics software.Data synthesis30 of the 40 included studies reported higher rates of smoking cessation among those receiving text messaging interventions compared with comparators, but only 10 were statistically significant. A meta-analysis of seven RCTs found that participants receiving text messages were significantly more likely to quit smoking compared with participants in no/minimal intervention or ‘usual care’ conditions (risk ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.29, p <0.001). Three trials found no benefit from a higher dose of text messages on smoking cessation. Two trials that tested the added benefit of text messaging to pharmacotherapy reported outcomes in favour of adding text messaging.ConclusionsFindings suggest that text messaging-based interventions are effective at promoting smoking cessation. Further research is required to establish if any additional benefit is gained from an increased number of text messages or concurrent pharmacotherapy or behavioural counselling.

Funder

Australian Research Council

National Health and Medical Research Council

World Health Organization

Publisher

BMJ

Reference59 articles.

1. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

2. World Health Organization . Tobacco. In: Fact Sheets. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2019.

3. A population-based study of cigarette smoking among illicit drug users in the United States

4. Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis;Cahill;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2013

5. Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis;Hartmann-Boyce;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3