Abstract
Background
Social capital may be a social good in health terms, but it is not
necessarily a universal good. Several studies have shown that while there is a
positive association between ecological social capital and health in people
with high individual-level social capital, this relationship is weaker or even
reversed in those with low individual-level social capital. Such studies,
however, have used relatively coarse levels of geography for quantifying
ecological social capital. The present study looks at this relationship at a
more fine-grained spatial scale.
Methods
Data from the National Survey for Wales (n=27 828, weighted mean age=48.4)
were linked to previously published small-area estimates (n=410) of ecological
social capital for Wales. Mixed effects models were then used to assess whether
the relationship between mental well-being and self-reported health on one
hand, and ecological social capital (sense of belonging) on the other, was
moderated by individual-level social capital.
Results
The models found the same moderation of the relationship that has been
demonstrated previously: Although ecological social capital is positively
associated with health in respondents with high individual-level social
capital, the relationship is negative in those with low individual-level social
capital.
Conclusion
This study replicates this association at a spatial scale orders of
magnitude more fine-grained than had been shown previously. Ecological social
capital is not an unambiguously positive factor for public health, and may be a
risk factor for marginalised people.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Epidemiology
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献