Abstract
IntroductionMonitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) is an integral part of research, programme and policy development and implementation. However, MEL methods used to monitor and evaluate interdisciplinary research projects are often informal and under-reported. This article describes the MEL protocol of the UKRI GCRF Action Against Stunting Hub (AASH).Methods and analysisThe AASH conducts interdisciplinary research into childhood stunting in India, Indonesia and Senegal across 23 distinct work packages. Project-specific MEL framework and methods will be implemented. A logframe will be developed to monitor and evaluate the research activities across the field sites including the number of participants recruited, questionnaires, measurements and procedures completed. MEL dashboards using Tableau and Glasscubes will be used to track and report progress, milestones and outcomes of the project. Dashboard outputs will be reported as numbers and percentages, with additional graphs/charts for easy visualisation. A ‘learning’ framework will be developed to outline appropriate pipelines for the dissemination of the research findings. This includes a theory of change explicating the overarching ambitions of the project in influencing policy, practice and research, and strategic engagement of relevant stakeholders to evaluate knowledge, attitudes and best practices for impactful engagement and dissemination of the research findings.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (17915/RR/17513); National Institute of Nutrition (ICMR)–Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India (CR/04/I/2021); Health Research Ethics Committee, University of Indonesia and Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (KET-887/UN2.F1/ETIK/PPM.00.02/2019); and the National Ethics Committee for Health Research (CNERS), Senegal (Protocole SEN19/78). Findings from this work will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented in conferences and disseminated to policy makers and research communities.
Funder
Global Challenges Research Fund
Reference10 articles.
1. Mertens DM , Wilson AT . Program Evaluation Theory and Practice. Guilford Publications, 2018.
2. Funnell SC , Rogers PJ . Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
3. Three approaches to monitoring: feedback systems, participatory monitoring and evaluation and logical frameworks;Jacobs;IDS Bull,2010
4. Garry Aslanyan A-A , Heintz M , Kagirl-Kalanzi E , et al . Four approaches to supporting equitable research partnerships. In: UKCDR and ESSENCE Good Practice Document (2022) (UK Collaborative on Development Research. 2022. Available: https://www.ukcdr.org.uk/resource/ukcdr-and-essence-2022-four-approaches-to-supporting-equitable-research-partnerships/
5. Campbell H , Vanderhoven D . Knowledge that matters: Realising the potential of Co-production. 2016.