Implementation of the WHO Standards to assess quality of paediatric care at the facility level using service users’ perspective as source of data: a multicentre quality improvement study in Italy

Author:

Bressan SilviaORCID,Sartor GiadaORCID,Dalena PaoloORCID,Balestra EliaORCID,Madera Anna,Marchetti FedericoORCID,Finocchiaro Maria CarlaORCID,Tirelli FrancescaORCID,Felici EnricoORCID,Marcellino AlessiaORCID,Fasoli Silvia,Cogo Paola,Parrino Roberta,Castaldo Benmario,Santangelo Rosa,Toniutti Maristella,De Rosa Giuseppina,Baltag Valentina,Lazzerini MarziaORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesThere is little experience in the use of the WHO Standards for improving the quality of care (QOC) for children at the facility level. We describe the use of 75 WHO Standard based Quality Measures to assess paediatric QOC, using service users as a source of data, in Italy.Study designIn a cross-sectional study including 12 hospitals, parents/caregivers of admitted children completed a validated questionnaire including 75 Quality Measures: 40 pertinent to the domain of experience of care; 25 to physical/structural resources; 10 to COVID-19 reorganisational changes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.ResultsAnswers from 1482 service users were analysed.Physical resourceswas the domain with the higher frequency of reported gaps in QOC, with key gaps (higher rates of responders reporting need for improvement and low variability across centres) being: (1) quality of meals (48.1%; range across facilities: 35.3%–61.7%); (2) presence of cooking areas (50.9%; range: 34.6%–70.0%); (3) spaces for family/friends (51.3%; range: 31.8%–77.4%). Forexperience of care, the most critical gap was the information on the rights of the child (76.6%; range: 59.9%–90.4%), with most other Quality Measures showing an overall frequency of reported need for improvement ranging between 5% and 35%. Forreorganisational changes due to COVID-19an improvement was felt necessary by <25% of responders in all Quality Measures, with low variability across centres. At the multivariate analyses, factors significantly associated with the QOC Index largely varied by QOC domain.ConclusionsThe use of the 75 prioritised Quality Measures, specific to service users’ perspective, enabled the identification of both general and facility-specific gaps in QOC. Based on these findings, quality improvement initiatives shall focus on a core list of selected Quality Measures common to all facilities, plus on an additional list of Quality Measures as more relevant in each facility.

Funder

Ministry of Health, Rome - Italy

Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste – Italy

Publisher

BMJ

Reference29 articles.

1. Level of Patient Satisfaction with Inpatient Services and Its Determinants: A Study of A Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia;Asamrew;J Environ Public Health,2020

2. The Influence of Patient and Hospital Characteristics on Inpatient Satisfaction at Beijing District-Level Hospitals;Liu;Patient Prefer Adherence,2021

3. World Health Organization ,. OECD & international bank for reconstruction and development. delivering quality health services: A global imperative for universal health coverage. World Health Organization; 2018. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272465 [Accessed 13 Mar 2023].

4. Improving Patient Experience of Care Providers in a Multispecialty Ambulatory Pediatrics Practice;Fustino;Clin Pediatr (Phila),2019

5. Patient Experience in a Spanish Pediatric Emergency Department;Parra;Pediatr Emerg Care,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3