Prospective validation of classification of intraoperative adverse events (ClassIntra): international, multicentre cohort study
Author:
Dell-Kuster SalomeORCID, Gomes Nuno V, Gawria Larsa, Aghlmandi Soheila, Aduse-Poku Maame, Bissett Ian, Blanc Catherine, Brandt Christian, ten Broek Richard B, Bruppacher Heinz R, Clancy Cillian, Delrio Paolo, Espin Eloy, Galanos-Demiris Konstantinos, Gecim I Ethem, Ghaffari Shahbaz, Gié Olivier, Goebel Barbara, Hahnloser Dieter, Herbst Friedrich, Orestis Ioannidis, Joller Sonja, Kang Soojin, Martín Rocio, Mayr Johannes, Meier Sonja, Murugesan Jothi, Nally Deirdre, Ozcelik Menekse, Pace Ugo, Passeri Michael, Rabanser Simone, Ranter Barbara, Rega Daniela, Ridgway Paul F, Rosman Camiel, Schmid Roger, Schumacher Philippe, Solis-Pena Alejandro, Villarino Laura, Vrochides Dionisios, Engel Alexander, O’Grady Greg, Loveday Benjamin, Steiner Luzius A, Van Goor Harry, Bucher Heiner C, Clavien Pierre-Alain, Kirchhoff Philipp, Rosenthal Rachel
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To prospectively assess the construct and criterion validity of ClassIntra version 1.0, a newly developed classification for assessing intraoperative adverse events.
Design
International, multicentre cohort study.
Setting
18 secondary and tertiary centres from 12 countries in Europe, Oceania, and North America.
Participants
The cohort study included a representative sample of 2520 patients in hospital having any type of surgery, followed up until discharge. A follow-up to assess mortality at 30 days was performed in 2372 patients (94%). A survey was sent to a representative sample of 163 surgeons and anaesthetists from participating centres.
Main outcome measures
Intraoperative complications were assessed according to ClassIntra. Postoperative complications were assessed daily until discharge from hospital with the Clavien-Dindo classification. The primary endpoint was construct validity by investigating the risk adjusted association between the most severe intraoperative and postoperative complications, measured in a multivariable hierarchical proportional odds model. For criterion validity, inter-rater reliability was evaluated in a survey of 10 fictitious case scenarios describing intraoperative complications.
Results
Of 2520 patients enrolled, 610 (24%) experienced at least one intraoperative adverse event and 838 (33%) at least one postoperative complication. Multivariable analysis showed a gradual increase in risk for a more severe postoperative complication with increasing grade of ClassIntra: ClassIntra grade I versus grade 0, odds ratio 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.42); grade II versus grade 0, 1.39 (0.97 to 2.00); grade III versus grade 0, 2.62 (1.31 to 5.26); and grade IV versus grade 0, 3.81 (1.19 to 12.2). ClassIntra showed high criterion validity with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.91) in the survey (response rate 83%).
Conclusions
ClassIntra is the first prospectively validated classification for assessing intraoperative adverse events in a standardised way, linking them to postoperative complications with the well established Clavien-Dindo classification. ClassIntra can be incorporated into routine practice in perioperative surgical safety checklists, or used as a monitoring and outcome reporting tool for different surgical disciplines. Future studies should investigate whether the tool is useful to stratify patients to the appropriate postoperative care, to enhance the quality of surgical interventions, and to improve long term outcomes of surgical patients.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03009929
.
Subject
General Engineering
Cited by
83 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|